Associated Topics || Dr. Math Home || Search Dr. Math

Calculating Calories Burned through Exercise

```Date: 05/11/2004 at 13:00:18
From: Michael
Subject: Calorie Physics

I wanted to know how many Calories are required to perform a "Bench
Press" and various other exercises.  Therefore, I figured out the
formula and wanted someone to check it for accuracy.

Using Newton's Second Law, I found the difficult part is converting
the values to Calories.  The values seem within reason but somehow I
feel something is missing...

Problem:  How many Calories are required to complete a Bench Press
using 3 sets of 5 repetitions at 205 lbs.?

Known values:  Weight = 205 lbs. or 92.986kg, Time (to complete one
rep) = 2 sec., Distance = 24 inches or 0.610m (0.305 meters per
second).

If Force (required to complete one rep) = 1kg * m/s2 = 1 Newton, then
92.986kq * 0.610m/2/2 = 14.18 Newtons.

However if I use the Fgrav = kg * 9.8N I get 911N which translates
to W = F * d * Cos(deg) which is = 911N * (0.610/2) * Cos(0) = 277.9 J
which converts to (3 sets of 5) = 995.8 Calories.

This result seems high in my opinion...am I close or way off?

```

```
Date: 05/11/2004 at 15:56:53
From: Doctor Edwin
Subject: Re: Calorie Physics

Hi, Michael.

There are a couple of minor problems with the work you've done so far,
but you're close.  First, the amount of time it takes you to move the
weight has no effect on how much energy it uses.  I know, that's not
how human muscles work, but that's how the physics of the situation
works.  For example, to hold a 10kg weight for two hours takes a lot
of calories.  But a two-by-four can do the same job without expending
any energy at all.  So from a pure physics perspective, you can ignore
the time it takes to move the weight.

The m/sec/sec factor actually is part of the measure of gravity, and
is not related to the distance you moved the weight, or to the time
you were moving it.  The formula you want is

energy =       force                 *  distance

=     mass * gravity          *  distance

= 92.986kg * 9.8m/sec/sec     * .61m

= 555.870308 kg m^2 /sec^2

= 555.870308 Joules

Your conversion to calories was correct.  I use a free units converter
at www.convertit.com. 555.8703 J gives me 132.7673 calories.  Not bad
for one rep!

However, dietary calories are actually kilocalories (whose idea was
THAT, anyway?).  So each rep is burning 0.132 calories.  Remember,
that's the theoretical minimum energy any device could expend moving
that weight that distance.  The real situation has us spending more
energy.  Here are some other factors that need to be considered:

- Googling around the web, I find that human muscle tissue is about
24% energy efficient, so you can multiply the energy so far by a
factor of 4.

- Lifting at 80% of your RM (rested maximum? Real Man? Romanian
meatloaf?) requires 12 times as much energy as lifting at 20%, partly
because you are using more stabilizing muscles.  So you are only 1/3
as efficient at high load.  Let's assume that the 24% represents the
efficiency at some average load, and I know I don't routinely work at
50% of my capacity, so let's assume that the average load is actually
on the low side.  So if you're lifting 80% of your RM, then you can
multiply the theoretical minimum expenditure by another 3.  (Sorry, I
lost the URL for this piece of information.)  So we're up to about
.132 * 15 * 4 * 3 = 23 dietary calories to do 15 reps.

- Even though the theoretical energy expenditure for moving the
weight doesn't depend on the time, the real expenditure certainly
does.  I have no way to account for this, but it's going to be a major
factor.  Just holding the bar for two seconds will require you to
expend calories.

- Actually, the theoretical minimum energy for doing the bench press
is zero, since the weight ends up where it started.  You COULD design
a machine that stored the energy when it lowered the bar (maybe by
compressing a gas cylinder) and then used that same energy to move it
back up for the next rep.  However, again, bodies don't do that.  It
requires almost as much energy to lower the bar back down as it does
to pick it up.

I hope this helps!

- Doctor Edwin, The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
```
Associated Topics:
High School Physics/Chemistry

Search the Dr. Math Library:

 Find items containing (put spaces between keywords):   Click only once for faster results: [ Choose "whole words" when searching for a word like age.] all keywords, in any order at least one, that exact phrase parts of words whole words

Submit your own question to Dr. Math
Math Forum Home || Math Library || Quick Reference || Math Forum Search