|


Number Puzzle Based on Multiplication IdeasDate: 08/07/2005 at 11:29:58 From: Kate Subject: Find the smallest natural number n...... Find the smallest natural number n which has the following properties: * Its decimal representation has 6 as the last digit * If the last digit 6 is erased and placed in front of the remaining digits, the resulting number is 4 times as large as the original number n. I know that the natural number n has ...46 as last 2 digits. When the digit 6 is shifted to front, then it will be 6...4. Also, before shifting the digit 6, the most front digit must be less than 6. That's what I have realized and tested, but I still can't work it out.
Date: 08/08/2005 at 00:15:29
From: Doctor Greenie
Subject: Re: Find the smallest natural number n......
Hi, Kate --
You are off to a great start when you noted that the last 2 digits of
the number must be "46".
How did you determine that? Presumably, you thought something like
this:
???????6
x 4
--------
???????4
Then, according to the statement of the problem, the next-to-last
digit in the number must be "4". So now you had
??????46
x 4
--------
???????4
But we can continue using this same reasoning over and over until we
find a solution to the problem. Because we know the last two digits
of the original number are "46", we can perform the multiplication
by 4 of these two final digits to determine that the second digit from
the right in the product is "8":
??????46
x 4
--------
??????84
Now we know the last two digits of the product; and according to the
rules of the problem, the "8" is the third digit from the right in the
original number. Then, by performing the multiplication by 4 of the
digits we now know of the original number, the third digit from the
right in the product is uniquely determined:
?????846
x 4
--------
?????384
And we just continue this process--multiplying the last digit we found
in the original number by 4 to find the next digit to the left in the
product, and copying that digit as the next digit to the left in the
original number:
????3846
x 4
--------
????5384
???53846
x 4
--------
???15384
??153846
x 4
--------
??615384
We now have a "6" as the first digit of the product; this means we are
done. The original number is 153846; multiplied by 4 the product is
615384.
We can also work the problem in the opposite direction by a similar
process. You noted in your original message that the first digit of
the original number must be "less than 6". In fact, if the original
number multiplied by 4 is to have "6" as the first digit, then the
first digit of the original number must be "1".
So we have
1????????
x 4
---------
6????????
But now, according to the rules for the problem, the "1" which is the
first digit of the original number must be the second digit of the
product:
1????????
x 4
---------
61???????
Now, by dividing the portion of the product we know by 4, we can see
61/4 = 15 (plus a remainder)
so the second digit of the original number must be "5"--and that means
the third digit of the product is "5":
15???????
x 4
---------
615??????
Again, we can repeat this process until we find the solution to the
problem:
615/4 = 153 (plus a remainder) so next digit is "3":
153??????
x 4
---------
6153?????
6153/4 = 1538 (plus a remainder) so next digit is "8":
1538?????
x 4
---------
61538????
61538/4 = 15384 (plus a remainder) so next digit is "4":
15384????
x 4
---------
615384???
615384/4 = 153846 (with no remainder)
Since there is no remainder, we are done. Again we have (of course)
found the same answer: the original number is 153846, and the product
when multiplied by 4 is 615384.
Please write back if you have questions on any of this.
- Doctor Greenie, The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
Date: 08/08/2005 at 06:05:07 From: Kate Subject: Thank you (Find the smallest natural number n......) Doctor Greenie, Thanks for your help in solving this question. I appreciate it, really! This is really a good place to learn math! I love it! |
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]


Ask Dr. MathTM
© 1994-2013 The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/