Special Relativity and Temperature
Date: 12/21/2005 at 19:39:29 From: Adam Subject: special relativity and temperature Hey Dr. Math... If temperature is the total amount of kinetic energy possessed by the particles in a given substance, and special relativity holds that nothing can move faster than the speed of light, does that mean that there is an upper limit for how hot a substance can become (e.g. the temperature where the particles begin to move at the speed of light)? Is there some kind of weird relativistic effect as the individual particles become time dilated and so forth to varying degrees? At what temperature, if any, would this become significant, and what would an observer of an object approaching the "temperature limit" see? I'm not sure whether I've made some huge conceptual error in even asking this question or not, but if it is valid, it seems that an object would become time dilated and experience an increase in equivalent mass as its temperature increased. Probably, the temperature would have to be extremely high for these effects to become noticeable. Especially hard to conceptualize is what would happen if some parts of the object became time dilated and length contracted, but not others, a scenario that is certainly possible with heat.
Date: 12/22/2005 at 08:20:54 From: Doctor Rick Subject: Re: special relativity and temperature Hi, Adam. What you are missing is that kinetic energy is not (1/2)mv^2 in the relativistic case. If it were, then it could be no greater than (1/2) mc^2. But that's not the case. The energy of a particle in special relativity is E = mc^2/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) where m is the mass of the particle, v is its velocity, and c is the speed of light. Note that when the particle is at rest, the energy is not 0, but E = mc^2 which you have probably seen before: it is Einstein's most famous equation. We call this the "rest energy" of the particle. The total energy can then be broken into two parts: Energy = rest energy + kinetic energy (energy of motion) E = mc^2 + mc^2(1/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) - 1) When v is much less than c, the kinetic energy is very close to KE = approximately (1/2)mv^2 which you can verify if you are familiar with the expansion (1+x)^n = 1 + nx + n(n-1)x^2/2! + ... This shows that the relativistic kinetic energy is really kinetic energy. However, as v increases toward c, KE increases WITHOUT LIMIT. You can check that out too: as v/c gets close to 1, the square root gets closer and closer to zero, and 1/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) gets larger and larger. There is no limit to how great the energy can be. Another way of looking at this is that the "relativistic mass" of the particle increases without limit as the velocity nears c. Therefore it takes more and more input of energy to increase the velocity another notch; it would take an infinite amount of energy to raise the velocity all the way to c. That's why a particle can't be accelerated to the speed of light or beyond: it takes too much work. You're right that temperature is a function of the kinetic energy of the particles in a substance. What I have shown is that the temperature is not limited by relativity. Of course, as you pump more and more energy into a substance, eventually it will cease to be that substance: first molecules will be dissociated, then atoms (forming a plasma), then even the nuclei will be dissociated. But that's another story. - Doctor Rick, The Math Forum http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
Date: 12/22/2005 at 22:39:09 From: Adam Subject: Thank you (special relativity and temperature) Thank you very much for this informative answer; it was exactly what I was looking for. You run a good site here!
Search the Dr. Math Library:
Ask Dr. MathTM
© 1994-2015 The Math Forum