Origin of the Term "Improper" FractionDate: 07/28/2006 at 13:15:24 From: AnneMarie Subject: origin of the term "improper" fraction I love your website and use it often. Do you know why fractions with larger numerators than denominators are called "improper"? Where did the terms "proper" and "improper" originate in relation to fractions? Just curious! Thank you. AnneMarie Date: 07/28/2006 at 14:28:05 From: Doctor Ian Subject: Re: origin of the term Hi AnneMarie, It might help to consider some other uses of "proper" in mathematics. For example, what are the divisors of 12? They are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12 But a number is _always_ a divisor of itself, so we use the term "proper divisor" to refer to the _other_ divisors. Similarly, a set is always a subset of itself, so we use "proper subset" to refer to subsets missing at least one element. You can find other examples by searching for the keyword "proper" at http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ So by extension, we might consider "proper" to be used, when talking about fractions, to exclude the analogous case, i.e., where the numerator isn't at least one less than the denominator. Does that make sense? - Doctor Ian, The Math Forum http://mathforum.org/dr.math/ Date: 07/28/2006 at 15:31:35 From: Doctor Peterson Subject: Re: origin of the term Hi, AnneMarie. To add a bit to what Dr. Ian said, I have two slightly different ways to approach the question. First, historically, if I want to strictly answer your question, I should tell you WHERE the usage first occurred. For that, we look here: Earliest uses of mathematical words http://jeff560.tripod.com/mathword.html That site says PROPER FRACTION appears in English in 1674 in Samuel Jeake Arithmetic (1701): "Proper Fractions always have the Numerator less than the Denominator, for then the parts signified are less than a Unit or Integer" (OED2). Second, to find WHERE a word comes from, and WHY, we can look in a dictionary. I looked up "proper" and found that it originally meant "belonging to one" or "peculiar to something"; then came to mean "appropriate or suitable" and "strictly correct". That last meaning, I think, is where the common mathematical use originated. A "proper fraction" is one that really is a fraction (a broken part, as it is etymologically) in a strict sense, rather than following the extended meaning mathematicians have given it (anything expressed as a/b). In same way, a "proper subset" is REALLY a subset, strictly speaking (a part, not the whole), and a "proper divisor" is STRICTLY a divisor, not just the same number, and so on. Another related usage is "the city proper", meaning "the city itself, taken in a narrow sense rather than a broad sense". In m-w.com, where I looked, this is defined as "strictly limited to a specified thing, place, or idea". Of all the definitions they give, I think this is the closest to the general mathematical usage. Finally, taking Dr. Ian's advice, I found this page: Proper http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Proper.html In general, the opposite of trivial. SEE ALSO: Proper Divisor, Proper Ideal, Proper Subset, Proper Class, Proper Submodule, Proper Fraction, Proper Subfield, Proper Extension, Proper Superset, Trivial. Taking that general sense of the word, one might wonder whether it would also exclude "trivial" cases at the other end of the spectrum: are the fraction 0/1, the subset {}, and the divisor 1 "improper"? Usually, the answer is no; but sometimes one might want to take it that way: Proper Divisor http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ProperDivisor.html To make matters even more confusing, the proper divisor is often defined so that -1 and 1 are also excluded. Using this alternative definition, the proper divisors of 6 would then be -3, -2, 2, and 3, and the improper divisors would be -6, -1, 1, and 6. We've more than answered your question, but I think it's interesting! If you have any further questions, feel free to write back. - Doctor Peterson, The Math Forum http://mathforum.org/dr.math/ |
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]
Ask Dr. Math^{TM}
© 1994-2015 The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/