|


Are There Times When Following the Rounding Rules Isn't Best?Date: 03/14/2007 at 22:22:07 From: Mary Subject: Rounding either up or down while using a two digit number With 32 - 15 the actual answer is 17. However, when rounding to the nearest 10 I am certain that 32 is rounded to 30. What way is the number 15 rounded if it is to be rounded once again to the nearest 10? My teacher is wanting us to round the numbers first before we solve the problem to see if our answer is close to the answer of the estimation to figure out if we got the correct answer. What I don't understand here is the number 15. If I round the 15 up to 20 for my estimation, then my answer to the estimated part of the problem would be 30 - 20 = 10. But if I round the 15 down to 10 as the closest 10 then my estimation is 30 - 10 = 20. My Mom says my teacher is trying to show me that by rounding 15 down, since it is 5 or less in the ones column, then my estimated answer of 20 is only 3 digits away from 17. My Dad is telling me that we should round the 15 up to 20. But that makes my estimated answer of 10 farther away from 17 since it is 7 digits away. Who is correct here? My mom or dad? Is the rule 5 and down rounds down? Or is it 5 and up rounds up? I'm so confused. Help! Mary Date: 03/15/2007 at 06:13:37 From: Doctor Peterson Subject: Re: Rounding either up or down while using a two digit number Hi, Mary. Both are right in some sense. Ultimately, the point here is that following rules is not the best way to do math; you should instead think about what will best accomplish your goal. The rule usually taught in school is that when the only digit you would drop in rounding a number is a 5, you round up. (There is another rule often taught that says you always round to the nearest even number.) If you just follow that rule here, rounding both numbers to the nearest 10, you get 32 - 15 =~ 30 - 20 = 10 (I'm using "=~" to mean "is approximately equal to".) But our goal is not just to follow rules; it is to get the best approximation we can, as easily as possible. And the round-up rule is only a custom: in reality, both 10 and 20 are equally close to 15, so neither can be called THE CLOSEST multiple of 10 to 15. We just pick one because we have to. If there is a better reason to choose one direction over the other, then we should follow that reason; and ANY reason is better than "because that's the way we do it"! So we think, instead: We're already rounding 32 down; if you decrease one number and increase the other in a subtraction, you are sure to change the result significantly. But if you decrease both by the same amount, you don't change the answer at all, and if you decrease them by similar amounts you won't change it much. So when you estimate a subtraction, it is best if you can round them both in the same direction. (For an addition, you'd want to round in opposite directions, one up and the other down.) So let's round the 15 down, contrary to the usual rule; we get 32 - 15 =~ 30 - 10 = 20 As you noted, this is a better estimate than following the usual rule for rounding. The exact answer is 17, which is closer to 20 than to 10. That's not surprising, since for our second answer we thought carefully about what would work best, and we were right! Now, I don't know which way your teacher expects you to do it. She may want you to follow the rule, as your father did, and will then show you that there is a more accurate way to estimate; or she may want you to think for yourself and discover the better answer (as you have done and your mother recommends). Either way, I think if you give the answer of 20 and explain why you chose to round down, it can't hurt! If you have any further questions, feel free to write back. - Doctor Peterson, The Math Forum http://mathforum.org/dr.math/ |
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]


Ask Dr. MathTM
© 1994-2008 The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/