|


Help Proving that the Sequence for the Natural Log Is Bounded
Date: 09/15/2009 at 09:17:24
From: Rahul
Subject: It is about the derivation of the number 'e'
Let a(sub n) be the sequence [1 + (1/n)]^n.
I understand that the sequence is monotonically increasing. But in
proving that it is also bounded, two of the steps remain unclear to
me.
This step is OK for me:
a(sub n) = 2 + (1/2!)[1 - (1/n)]
+ (1/3!)[1 - (1/n)][1 - (2/n)]
+ ... up to (n + 1) terms.
This step, however, I do not understand:
a(sub n) < 2 + (1/2!) + (1/3!) + ...... + (1/n!)
The reasoning for this is given to be that
1 - (1/n) < 1
1 - (2/n) < 1
That is how those terms containing n in the brackets behave. (The
above inequalities also are understood because n being 1, 2, 3, ....
1/n <= 1.)
Now, two times anything greater than 1 is greater than 2. For example,
2*(1.5) = 3.
Two times anything less than 1 is less than 2. For example,
2*(0.5) = 1; or 2*(0.9)= 1.8.
And 2*1 = 2.
So, the second step above is true for 2; but how do you generalize it?
Date: 09/16/2009 at 05:38:07
From: Doctor Ali
Subject: Re: It is about the derivation of the number 'e'
Hi Rahul!
Thanks for writing to Dr. Math.
Just note that when you accept that
1 - (1/n) < 1
1 - (2/n) < 1
...,
we can say that any product of the above expressions is still less
than one.
So, we can say that the original series are like
1 + 1/2! + 1/3! + 1/4! + ...,
where every term is multiplied by a number less than one. Therefore,
it is less than the above series.
Does that make sense?
Please write back if you still have any difficulties.
- Doctor Ali, The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
|
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]


Ask Dr. MathTM
© 1994-2013 The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/