Associated Topics || Dr. Math Home || Search Dr. Math

### New TV, Different Aspect Ratio ... Same Height?

```Date: 01/04/2010 at 11:54:50
From: Anthony
Subject: What size HD TV equals my old picture size

Hi, Dr Math.

How do I figure out what size HD TV to buy so that its screen is at
least as tall as my old TV's was?  My old TV measures 29 inches
diagonally.

I know that right triangles can be used to compare the two screens,
but I don't know how to compute the vertical dimension knowing only
the diagonal of the old TV; and I don't know the ratio of an old set
to a new HD set.

```

```
Date: 01/04/2010 at 20:45:58
From: Doctor Rick
Subject: Re: What size HD TV equals my old picture size

Hi, Anthony.

The old analog standard (NTSC in the US) had an aspect ratio of 4:3
for the actual display area of a picture tube.  The new HD standard
has an aspect ratio of 16:9.

Thus, in the old set, if the height is H, then the width is (4/3)H,
and the diagonal is

sqrt(H^2 + ((4/3)H)^2) = H*sqrt(1 + 16/9) = (5/3)H

So we can set up this relation between your old set's picture height
and its diagonal:

(5/3)H = 29"

Isolating H and simplifying gives us:

H = (3/5)*29"
= 17.4"

Now, in an HD set with a picture height of 17.4 inches, the width is

17.4" * 16/9 = 30.93"

The diagonal is thus

sqrt(17.4^2 + 30.93^2) = 35.5"

To get a picture height at least as tall as your old set, you'll need
a new set with a diagonal of 35.5 inches or greater.

In general, if the old diagonal is D, the old height is (3/5)D, and
the new diagonal is

D*sqrt(337)/15 = 1.2238

- Doctor Rick, The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/

```

```
Date: 01/05/2010 at 10:44:44
From: Anthony
Subject: Thank you (What size HD TV equals my old picture size)

Thanks, Dr. Rick.

The information you gave me certainly pointed me in the right
direction.  Because I haven't done this type of math in a long time,
and there were a lot of details omitted from your response, a
friend and I spent another hour trying to fill in those gaps!  It was
an interesting exercise, as I am very much out of practice.  I need a
LOT of help with the mathematical processes, but I think I get it
now.  My brain is now sore, and I think I need a nap, so in the
future I will just multiply the old diagonal by 1.2238, as you said.
Thank you for your time and guidance!

```

```
Date: 01/05/2010 at 11:32:40
From: Doctor Rick
Subject: Re: Thank you (What size HD TV equals my old picture size)

Hi, Anthony.

You're welcome. I gave the final answer so you wouldn't *need* to
fill in the gaps (you could have just trusted me!), but I'm gratified
that you were interested enough in the math to put in the effort to
understand it.

- Doctor Rick, The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/

```

```
Date: 01/05/2010 at 13:52:08
From: Anthony
Subject: Thank you (What size HD TV equals my old picture size)

Oh, I trusted you, but the root of my question was *how* do I figure
it out.

This question has started a small firestorm of lost productivity at
work as the self-proclaimed math wizards in my office are now trying
to arrive at the solution from different directions.  Want to join
in?  The camps are split along algebra and trig lines.

As for me ... I'm just going to watch something on my new HD TV.

Thanks again :)

```

```
Date: 01/05/2010 at 14:04:11
From: Doctor Rick
Subject: Re: Thank you (What size HD TV equals my old picture size)

Hi, Anthony.

Go ahead and relax in front of the TV, but you might have one of the
wizards in the trig camp write in and tell me how they can possibly
bring trigonometry into this when no angles are involved.  I think
that the most they can do is to "re-invent" Pythagoras, coming back
to the same solution via a roundabout path.

- Doctor Rick, The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/

```

```
Date: 01/06/2010 at 16:13:07
From: Doctor Rick
Subject: Re: Thank you (What size HD TV equals my old picture size)

Hi, Anthony.

I got the attachment, and it's as I expected: the Pythagorean theorem
is hidden in the trigonometry.

*-----------------*
|              /  |
|        5  /     |
|        /        |3    (showing ratio of height to width, 3:4)
|     /           |
|  / theta        |
*-----------------*
4

tan theta = 3/4
theta = 36.87 deg

*-----------------*
|              /  |
|      29   /     |
|        /        |x    (similar figure with known diagonal)
|     /           |
|  / theta        |
*-----------------*

sin theta = x/29
0.6 = x/29
x = 17.4

The Pythagorean theorem applies to trig functions as

sin^2(theta) + cos^2(theta) = 1

I can use this relation to find the sine of an angle whose tangent is
known: dividing both sides by sin^2(theta), I get

1 + 1/tan^2(theta) = 1/sin^2(theta)

This also required the fact that sin(theta)/cos(theta) = tan(theta).

Then solve for sin(theta):

sin(theta) = 1/sqrt(1 + 1/tan^2(theta))

When tan(theta) = 3/4, we find

sin(theta) = 1/sqrt(1 + 16/9)
= 1/sqrt(25/9)
= 3/5

That's why we get such a simple value for the sine of theta; this is
a 3-4-5 right triangle.  I labeled the diagonal of the first figure
with length 5 accordingly.  The result for x then follows by similar
triangles:

x/29 = 3/5
x = 29*3/5
= 17.4

The remainder of the work is a similar application of trig to the
16:9 rectangle:

tan(omega) = 9/16
omega = 29.36 deg
sin(omega) = 17.4/d_new

d_new = 35.49...

My work:

d_new^2 = 17.4^2 + [17.4*(16/9)]^2
= 17.4^2 (1 + 256/81)

d_new = 17.4*sqrt(1 + 256/81)
= 35.49...

Both methods work; I can't say one method is superior to the other.
I prefer mine aesthetically because it requires only a square root,
and I feel that it shows connections that are hidden by the
trigonometry.  The other point of view is that, given that you have a
scientific calculator, the work is simpler when you bring the angles
into the picture. To each his own!

- Doctor Rick, The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
```
Associated Topics:
High School Geometry
High School Practical Geometry

Search the Dr. Math Library:

 Find items containing (put spaces between keywords):   Click only once for faster results: [ Choose "whole words" when searching for a word like age.] all keywords, in any order at least one, that exact phrase parts of words whole words

Submit your own question to Dr. Math
Math Forum Home || Math Library || Quick Reference || Math Forum Search