|


Euler in the Product of a Regular Polygon's Diagonal Lengths
Date: 04/06/2010 at 06:42:07
From: Robin
Subject: Why is sinpi/n.sin2pi/n....sin(n-1)pi/n=n/2^(n-1)
An n-sided regular polygon A1, A2, ... An is drawn on a circle of radius
1.
Numerically, the product A1A2 * A1A3 * ... * A1An seems to equal n, e.g.,
2sin20 * 2sin40 * 2sin60 * ...
... * 2sin160 = 9 (with error 1.6E-13 by calculator)
And I can prove the product of these polygon diagonals equals n for n = 3,
4, 5, 6, 8.
But there do not seem to be exact values for, e.g., sin20 = sin(pi/9), so
how can I get to a proof for any n? Is this a famous theorem?
Date: 04/08/2010 at 00:03:18
From: Doctor Vogler
Subject: Re: Why is sinpi/n.sin2pi/n....sin(n-1)pi/n=n/2^(n-1)
Hi Robin,
Thanks for writing to Dr. Math.
Here is a proof using complex numbers and Euler's equation, which is
described below, in case it's new to you:
Imaginary exponents and Euler's equation.
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/faq.euler.equation.html
You are trying to compute the product over 1 <= k <= n-1
n-1
product 2 * sin(k*pi/n).
k=1
First of all, set
z = exp(i*pi/n), or e^(i*pi/n).
Then we have
z^k = cos(k*pi/n) + i*sin(k*pi/n)
and
z^k - z^(-k) = 2*i*sin(k*pi/n).
Now define the polynomial
f(x) = 1 + x + x^2 + ... + x^(n - 1)
= (x^n - 1)/(x - 1).
This function is the product of x - r over its (n - 1) roots. And
f(x) = 0 if x^n = 1,
but x is not 1.
Well, when x = z^(2k),
x^n = (z^(2k))^n
= exp(n*2k*i*pi/n)
= exp(k*2*pi*i) = 1,
but z^(2k) is not 1 when 1 <= k <= n - 1.
So that means that
n-1
f(x) = product (x - z^(2k)).
k=1
Therefore, we have
n-1
f(1) = product (1 - z^(2k)).
k=1
But
f(1) = 1^0 + 1^1 + 1^2 + 1^3 + ... + 1^(n - 1)
= n.
Therefore, we have the equation
n-1
n = product (1 - z^(2k))
k=1
And we're almost there!
Now multiply both sides of the equation by
n-1
product i*z^(-k) = i^(n - 1)*z^-(1 + 2 + 3 + ... + (n - 1))
k=1 = i^(n - 1)*z^(-n(n - 1)/2)
Use the fact that z^n = -1 to prove that this number is always 1, and then
conclude that ...
n-1
n = product -i*(z^k - z^(-k))
k=1
... and therefore
n-1
n = product 2 * sin(k*pi/n)
k=1
... just like you wanted.
If you have any questions about this or need more help, please write back
and show me what you have been able to do, and I will try to offer further
suggestions.
- Doctor Vogler, The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
Date: 04/08/2010 at 14:41:20
From: Robin
Subject: Thank you (Why is sinpi/n.sin2pi/n....sin(n-1)pi/n=n/2^(n-1))
Delighted with your rapid response -- very elegant! I love the use of
f(x).
Now I can complete my proof that
INT (0 to infinity) 1/(1 + x^p)
= pi/p/sin(pi/p)
for all real p > 1.
Since retiring from teaching, I have had more time to find out things I
should have learnt at university but was too busy (!) -- and nearly all of
them come back to Euler.
Is this proof down to Euler?
Thank you very much, indeed.
Robin Murphy, D.Phil, MA (Oxon)
Date: 04/11/2010 at 22:56:31 From: Doctor Vogler Subject: Re: Thank you (Why is sinpi/n.sin2pi/n....sin(n-1)pi/n=n/2^(n-1)) Hi Robin, Uh, I couldn't say who was the first to come up with this proof. I proved it myself rather than finding it in a book, but I'm sure that I'm not the first to do so. - Doctor Vogler, The Math Forum http://mathforum.org/dr.math/ |
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]


Ask Dr. MathTM
© 1994-2013 The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/