Envelope
From Math Images
Line 13:  Line 13:  
<div id = "Family">  <div id = "Family">  
  {{HideShowThisShowMessage='''A note on  +  {{HideShowThisShowMessage='''A note on terminology: Click to show the definition of''' a family of curves.HideMessage='''Click to hide the definition of''' a family of curves.HiddenText= 
{{{!}} border=1 cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0  {{{!}} border=1 cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0  
Line 61:  Line 61:  
<div id = "Parabola">  <div id = "Parabola">  
  {{HideShowThisShowMessage='''A note on  +  {{HideShowThisShowMessage='''A note on terminology: Click to show the definition of a parabola's ''' focus and directrix.HideMessage='''Click to hide the definition of a parabola's''' focus and directrix.HiddenText= 
{{{!}} border=1 cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0  {{{!}} border=1 cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0  
Line 89:  Line 89:  
<div id = "Ellipse">  <div id = "Ellipse">  
  {{HideShowThisShowMessage='''A note on  +  {{HideShowThisShowMessage='''A note on terminology: Click to show the definition of an ellipse's ''' foci.HideMessage='''Click to hide the definition of an ellipse's''' foci.HiddenText= 
{{{!}} border=1 cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0  {{{!}} border=1 cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0  
Line 116:  Line 116:  
<br>  <br>  
<div id = "Hyperbola">  <div id = "Hyperbola">  
  {{HideShowThisShowMessage='''A note on  +  {{HideShowThisShowMessage='''A note on terminology: Click to show the definition of a hyperbola's ''' foci.HideMessage='''Click to hide the definition of a hyperbola's''' foci.HiddenText= 
{{{!}} border=1 cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0  {{{!}} border=1 cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0  
Line 167:  Line 167:  
{{!}}}  {{!}}}  
  In [[#Figure35Figure 35]], we begin with a hyperbola, with points ''F1'' and ''F2'' as its  +  In [[#Figure35Figure 35]], we begin with a hyperbola, with points ''F1'' and ''F2'' as its foci and ''A'' as its center. Our sweeping circle has its center ''O'' on the hyperbola, and passes through A. 
If we slide ''O'' along the hyperbola, we will get a ''Lemniscate'' as the envelope of the sweeping circle.  If we slide ''O'' along the hyperbola, we will get a ''Lemniscate'' as the envelope of the sweeping circle.  
Line 180:  Line 180:  
{{!}}}  {{!}}}  
  +  In [[#Figure35Figure 35]], if instead of having A as center of the hyperbola, we move it to an arbitrary position between the hyperbola's two halves, then we will get a variation of "lemniscate", which has a funny shape like a bunny's ears.  
Line 186:  Line 186:  
<br>  <br>  
  The following envelopes have more complicated mechanism than previous ones. But  +  The following envelopes have more complicated mechanism than previous ones. But as a result they are also more interesting. 
  +  
<div id = "Ellipticenvelope"></div>  <div id = "Ellipticenvelope"></div>  
Line 198:  Line 198:  
{{HideShowThisShowMessage=Click to show the mechanism behindHideMessage=Click to conceal the mechanism behindHiddenText=  {{HideShowThisShowMessage=Click to show the mechanism behindHideMessage=Click to conceal the mechanism behindHiddenText=  
<br>  <br>  
  First, let's look at the family of  +  First, let's look at the family of ellipses <math>{x^2 \over c^2} + {y^2 \over (1c)^2 } = 1</math>: 
{{{!}}border="0" cellpadding=20 cellspacing=20  {{{!}}border="0" cellpadding=20 cellspacing=20  
{{!}}{{AnchorReference=Figure41Link=[[Image:Astroid2.pngcenterthumb400pxFigure 41]]}}{{!}}{{!}}{{AnchorReference=Figure42Link=[[Image:Astroid3.pngcenterthumb400pxFigure 42]]}}  {{!}}{{AnchorReference=Figure41Link=[[Image:Astroid2.pngcenterthumb400pxFigure 41]]}}{{!}}{{!}}{{AnchorReference=Figure42Link=[[Image:Astroid3.pngcenterthumb400pxFigure 42]]}}  
Line 209:  Line 209:  
However, if we choose another <math>c = 0.89</math>, which is larger than <math>1\over2</math>, then we will have <math>c^2 > (1c)^2</math>, which makes yaxis the major axis.  However, if we choose another <math>c = 0.89</math>, which is larger than <math>1\over2</math>, then we will have <math>c^2 > (1c)^2</math>, which makes yaxis the major axis.  
  +  To get the envelope of this family of ellipses, we can let c vary continuously from 0 to 1 and trace the area swept by these ellipses. As shown in the following gif animation, the envelope turns out to be an astroid, exactly like the one we constructed in the [[#Beginningladder example]]:  
NumChars=20}}  NumChars=20}}  
+  
{{AnchorReference=Figure43Link=[[Image:Astroid2.gifcenterthumb500pxFigure 43 <br>Astroid as envelope of ellipses]]}}  {{AnchorReference=Figure43Link=[[Image:Astroid2.gifcenterthumb500pxFigure 43 <br>Astroid as envelope of ellipses]]}}  
Line 218:  Line 219:  
<br>  <br>  
  The WallaceSimson line is related to  +  The WallaceSimson line is related to an interesting theorem in geometry proposed by William Wallace in 1796. The theorem itself is not hard to prove, and with a little manipulation we can get one of the most beautiful envelopes out of it. 
<br><br>  <br><br>  
  {{HideShowThisShowMessage=Click to show the mechanism behindHideMessage=Click to conceal the mechanism behindHiddenText=  +  {{HideShowThisShowMessage=Click to show the mechanism behind thisHideMessage=Click to conceal the mechanism behind thisHiddenText= 
<br>  <br>  
Line 230:  Line 231:  
{{!}}}  {{!}}}  
  In Figure 51,  +  The two figures above shows the construction process of WallaceSimson line. In Figure 51, we start by drawing an arbitrary triangle and its circumscribed circle O. Then we select an arbitrary point M on the circumscribed circle, and make ''perpendicular projections'' of M onto the 3 sides of the triangle (extend line segment if not inside triangle), intersecting at P, Q, and R. 
  Wallace claimed that the three projections are on the same straight line (see the orange line in [[#Figure52Figure 52]]). This line is called WallaceSimson Line. A proof of this theorem can be found here <ref name = ref2>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simson_line Simson Line], from Wikipedia. This is a simple proof of the existence of WallaceSimson line.</ref>.  +  Wallace claimed that the three projections are on the same straight line (see the orange line in [[#Figure52Figure 52]]). This line is called WallaceSimson Line. A proof of this theorem can be found [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simson_line here]<ref name = ref2>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simson_line Simson Line], from Wikipedia. This is a simple proof of the existence of WallaceSimson line.</ref>. 
  Since M is an arbitrary point on circle O, we can  +  Since M is an arbitrary point on circle O, we can certainly move it along the circle, and points P, Q, and R are also going to move, since they are perpendicular projections of point M. So we will have a sweeping WallaceSimson Line, and its envelope is a deltoid, as shown in the following animation: 
NumChars=20}}  NumChars=20}}  
  
  +  {{AnchorReference=Figure53Link=[[Image:Deltoid.gifcenterframeFigure 53 <br>Deltoid as envelope of WallaceSimson Line]]}}  
  +  {{HideShowThisShowMessage=Special note: Is this an envelope or not? (click to show)HideMessage=Special note: Is this an envelope or not? (click to hide)HiddenText=  
  +  {{{!}} border=1 cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0  
  +  {{!}}<br>One may be puzzled by the fact that, in [[#Figure53Figure 53]], the WallaceSimson line actually sweeps across the whole plane. If envelope is defined as "the boundary of area swept by a family of curves", then in this case there should be no envelope at all! So where does this Deltoid come from? And why do people call it an envelope?  
+  <br>  
+  To answer these questions, we have to look at the animation more carefully. A more thorough examination of the sweeping process reveals the fact that area inside the Deltoid is swept 3 times, while area outside is swept only once. In fact, as shown in Figure 54, this sweeping process can be divided into 3 parts, so that in each part the WallaceSimson line sweeps out 1/3 of the whole Deltoid as strict envelope, without lines from other parts sticking out. The whole Deltoid can be viewed as these segments put together. Although it's not a single, perfect envelope, this doesn't affect its appearance.  
+  <br><br>  
+  {{{!}} border=0 cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0  
+  {{!}}{{AnchorReference=Figure54aLink=[[Image:Deltoid_a.jpgcenterthumb250pxFigure 54 (a)]]}}{{!}}{{!}}{{AnchorReference=Figure54bLink=[[Image:Deltoid_b.jpgcenterthumb250pxFigure 54 (b)]]}}{{!}}{{!}}{{AnchorReference=Figure54cLink=[[Image:Deltoid_c.jpgcenterthumb250pxFigure 54 (c)]]}}  
+  {{!}}}  
+  <br>  
+  {{!}}}  
+  NumChars=0}}  
+  This envelope was firstly proved by Swiss mathematician Jakob Steiner. In 1856 he published a paper, giving a lengthy proof of why we get a Deltoid when moving the WallaceSimson Line. A simplified version of this proof can be found [http://www.rac.es/ficheros/doc/00045.pdf here]<ref name = ref3>[http://www.rac.es/ficheros/doc/00045.pdf M. de Guzman, 2001, ''A simple proof of the Steiner theorem on the deltoid'']. This is a simplified version of Jakob Steiner's proof.</ref>.  
+  
+  
+  Notice that Astroid, Cardioid, Nephroid, and Deltoid all belong to '' the Roulette Family'', which means they can also be constructed by rolling a circle around another. For more information about Roulettes, please go to [[Roulettethis page]].  
+  
+  
<div id = "MME"></div>  <div id = "MME"></div> 
Revision as of 00:38, 7 June 2012
Blueaerialshell 

Blueaerialshell
 This is a beautiful blueaerialshell firework filling the sky. Each particle of the firework follows a parabolic trajectory, and together they sweep a parabolic area.
Contents 
Basic Description
In geometry, an envelope of a family of curves is the boundary of these curves' "sweeping area". In most cases, it's tangent to each member of the family at some point.


Surprisingly, as shown in Figure 12, the area swept by a moving straight line does not necessarily have a straight boundary. In fact, its envelope is the firstquadrant portion of an astroid . One may notice the Astroid is always tangent to the ladder at some point during the sliding process, as stated in the definition of an envelope.
If we slide the ladder in other three quadrants, we will get a complete starshaped envelope, as shown in Figure 13. In fact, the name astroid comes from the Greek word for "star".
For the math behind this envelope, please go to the More Mathematical Explanation section.
A gallery of beautiful envelopes
Envelope of lines
As we have seen the ladder example, a moving straight line can have a curve as its envelope. Here are more examples:


In Figure 21, line m, our sweeping line, is perpendicular to segment OA at its midpoint M. Point O is fixed in space.
If we slide point A along line l, line m will sweep out a Parabola, with point O as its focus and line l as its directrix.


Similar to what we did in Figure 21, our sweeping line is still the perpendicular bisector of segment AB. The only difference is that point A now slides on a circle, rather a straight line.
The result is an Ellipse with O and B as its foci, as shown in Figure 24.


Similar to what we did in the previous example, our sweeping line is still the perpendicular bisector of segment AB. The only difference is that point B is outside the circle.
The result is a Hyperbola with O and B as its foci, as shown in Figure 26.
So far we have got all of the three Conic Section Curves as envelopes of straight lines. However, the sweeping curve of envelopes are in no ways restricted to straight lines. Circle, Ellipse, and other curves can make fantastic envelopes as well.
Envelope of circles
This section shows some interesting envelopes generated by moving a circle around.


In Figure 31, we begin with a base circle O, which is fixed in space, then select two points A and B on the base circle. Our sweeping circle is centered at A, and passes through B.
If we fix point B and slide point A along the fixed circle, circle A will sweep out a Cardioid, as shown in Figure 32.
The name "Cardioid" comes from the Greek word for "heartshaped". For more information about the Cardioid, please go to this page.


Similar to what we did in Figure 31, we still have a fixed base circle O, and a sweeping circle that has its center A sliding on the base circle. The only difference is that our sweeping circle is now tangent to a vertical line l, rather than passes through a fixed point.
The result is a Nephroid, which is the Greek word for "kidneyshaped". For more information about Nephroid please go here.


In Figure 35, we begin with a hyperbola, with points F1 and F2 as its foci and A as its center. Our sweeping circle has its center O on the hyperbola, and passes through A.
If we slide O along the hyperbola, we will get a Lemniscate as the envelope of the sweeping circle.
Lemniscate is an eightshaped curve discovered by Jacob Bernoulli ^{[1]}. For more information about Lemniscate please go here.


In Figure 35, if instead of having A as center of the hyperbola, we move it to an arbitrary position between the hyperbola's two halves, then we will get a variation of "lemniscate", which has a funny shape like a bunny's ears.
More complicated envelopes
The following envelopes have more complicated mechanism than previous ones. But as a result they are also more interesting.
1.Astroid again, but this time using ellipses
Recall that in Figure 11, we showed how to construct an astroid using a line segment sliding on coordinate axes. Actually there is another way to generate the same astroid: using a family of ellipses.
2.Deltoid as envelope of WallaceSimson lines
The WallaceSimson line is related to an interesting theorem in geometry proposed by William Wallace in 1796. The theorem itself is not hard to prove, and with a little manipulation we can get one of the most beautiful envelopes out of it.
This envelope was firstly proved by Swiss mathematician Jakob Steiner. In 1856 he published a paper, giving a lengthy proof of why we get a Deltoid when moving the WallaceSimson Line. A simplified version of this proof can be found here^{[3]}.
Notice that Astroid, Cardioid, Nephroid, and Deltoid all belong to the Roulette Family, which means they can also be constructed by rolling a circle around another. For more information about Roulettes, please go to this page.
A More Mathematical Explanation
 Note: understanding of this explanation requires: *Calculus
At the beginning of this page, we gave the following definition:
 An envelope of a family of curves is the boundary of their sweeping area.
However, if we want a more mathematical explanation of envelope, we have to redefine it in a more mathematical way, because two serious problems arise with the original definition when we dive into more math:
First, not all 2D curves can be represented as a single function y = f(x) with a variable parameter t. For example, a circle can not be expressed unless we use two functions, and . So we have to introduce new ways to describe curves.
Second, "boundary of the sweeping area" is a rough description in everyday language. It's not something that we can use to derive mathematical formula and equations. So we have to be clear about we mean by "sweep", "boundary", and so on.
In the rest of this section, we are going to deal with these two problems one by one, and show how can we get a good mathematical explanation of envelopes using the new definition.
Resolve the first problem: the power of level sets
The first problem is easily resolved if we describe 2D curves using level sets, rather than images of onevariable functions y = f(x).
In Multivariable Calculus, the level set of a twovariable function F(x,y) at height C is defined as the set of points (x,y) that satisfy the condition F(x,y) = C. For example, instead of writing y = 2x  1 for a line, we could write 2x  y = 1, in which F(x,y) = 2x  y and C = 1.
In general, level sets are more powerful than images of single functions when we need to describe 2D curves, since all single variable functions can be written in the level set form , but the converse is not true. Some of the level sets can not be rewritten as y = f(x) unless we use multiple functions (see the circle in Figure 61), others can't be reduced at all (see the level set curve in Figure 62).


Because of these advantages of level sets, in the rest of this section we will use , rather than , to describe a family of curves. At least for the purpose of envelopes, level set is sufficient to describe all 2D curves that we care about.
Resolve the second problem: the boundary condition
The next question is, given a family of level set curves F(x,y,t) = C with variable parameter t, how can we find its boundary and express it in mathematical language?
The answer is given by the boundary condition, which states that:
 For a family of level set curves F(x,y,t) = C with variable parameter t, it's envelope, or boundary of sweeping area, must satisfy the condition .
To see why this is true, let's look more carefully at the ladder problem. The following two images are different phases of a ladder captured in the sliding process.


In Figures 63 and 64, different phases of a sliding ladder are indicated using different colors. One may immediately notice that if we connect the intersections of different phases, we will get a curve close to the astroid envelope. It is not exactly the envelope because the time intervals between different captured phases are finite. However, if we make the time intervals shorter, the curve connecting them will get closer and closer to the envelope.
This is not mere coincidence. Same thing happens in the elliptic envelope of astroid (see Figure 65) . Actually it can be shown that if we choose two phases with infinitely small time interval, then their intersection must lie on the envelope. The argument goes as following:
In Figure 65, it's obvious that in one phase, the only segment that contributes to the envelope is between its intersections with the previous and next phase. For example, in the green ellipse, which has variable parameter t = 0.40, the segment above point A is covered by the orange envelope, thus not contributing to the envelope. Similarly the segment below point B does not contribute since it's covered by the blue ellipse. So the envelope is actually consisted of many "chunks" of segments that's not covered by other phases.
Now consider what happens if we increase the number of captures, and shorten each time interval:
 Two neighboring phases will approximate each other.
 Two intersections A and B will be closer.
 Segment AB will be shorter and smoother.
Eventually, when the number of captures goes to infinity, points A and B will meet together, and segment AB will be "squeezed" into one point on the envelope (call this point P). Recall that P is the intersection of two neighboring phases:
 and
which gives us:
This is the boundary condition we are trying to prove. The same argument goes for every other envelope.
One may also notice that, since the envelope only touches each curve at this single "squeezed" point, it is tangent to every curve in the family. In fact, envelope can also be defined as a curve that is tangent to every one of a family of curves.
Conclusion and Application
Now we have the family of level set curves:
and the boundary condition:
Since every point on the envelope must satisfy both equations, we can combine them to solve for a 2D envelope curve. However, the calculation involved is rather long and complicated, so here I will only prove a simple case: the envelope of a sliding ladder is an Astroid.
Proof for the Astroid envelope
See Figure 66, the length of the ladder is a. For simplicity we will only consider the envelope in first quadrant.
Choose xcoordinate of point A as the variable parameter t. So ycoordinate of point B is
Thus the equation of line AB, our sweeping curve, is:
Differentiate Eq.1 to get the boundary condition:
From which we can get:
Substitute Eq.1 into Eq.2 twice, first substitute x, and then y, we get:
Substitute back into Eq.1, we get:
Which leads to:
 , the equation of an Astroid.
Other proofs are similar.^{[4]}
Why It's Interesting
Although envelope looks like a pure math concept, it does have some interesting applications in various areas, such as Microeconomics, Applied Physics, and String Arts:
Application in Microeconomics: the Envelope Theorem
Economists often deal with maximization or minimization problems: to maximize benefit, minimize cost, maximize social revenue, and so on. However, the problem is that there are so many variable parameters in economics. How many men should I hire? How much land should I buy or rent? Should I invest more money to buy new machines, or should I just do with old ones? Because of all these variable parameters, economists often end up doing maximization or minimization of a family of curves, rather than a single curve (see Figure 71)
So here comes the Envelope Theorem. It allows economists to find the envelope of a family of curves first, and then determine the maximum or minimum value on the envelope. Since no points go beyond the envelope, this point must be the absolute extrumum among the whole family of curves
For more about the Envelope Theorem, please go here^{[5]}.
Application in Physics: Envelope of Waves


In physics, if we combine two wave of almost the same wavelength and frequency, we will get a beating wave (see Figure 72). For such a wave, physicists usually care more about its envelope, rather than the wave itself, since the envelope is what people will actually hear, or see. For example, the two branches of a tuning fork are almost, but not exactly identical. So if a tuning fork starts to vibrate, its two branches will produce two slightly different sound waves. The superposition of these two waves is a beating sound wave with varying amplitude. This is why people can hear "beats" when they strike a tuning fork.
A similar mechanism is used in AM (Amplitude Modulation) broadcasting. Different waves are superposed with each other to form a sinusoidal carrier wave with changing amplitude, which can be used to carry audio signals (see Figure 73). For more about broadcasting, please go here ^{[6]}.
Application in String Arts


String Arts is a material representation of envelope, in which people arrange colored straight strings to form complicated geometric figures.
For more about String Art please go here.
How the Main Image Relates
As pointed out in the main image, the envelope of all particles' trajectories in an exploding firework is a parabola. Here comes the explanation:
Figure 81 shows a simulation of the exploding process. Blue parabolas are trajectories of particles, and the red parabola is their envelope.
For the envelope to be parabolic, we have to make several assumptions:
 The firework is consisted of many shinning particles, each projected from the origin at the same time, with same velocity v.
 Particles are subject to constant gravity, with gravitational acceleration g.
 Air friction can be neglected. In fact, this turns out to be an arguable assumption. Most firework particles are relatively small and light, so they could be significantly deflected by air friction. However, the case with air friction is way too complicated for this page. Besides, air friction can be neglected, at least for some fireworks with big and heavy particles such as blueaerialshell. So we can still accept this assumption and see what happens.
With the assumptions above, we can write out the trajectory of one particular particle:
 ,
in which is the angle of projection. This is a result from simple mechanics. For more about projectile trajectory, please go here^{[7]}.
For now, let's leave Physics behind and focus on the curves themselves. In this trajectory, is the variable parameter. If we denote by , we can write out a family of curves (in level set form):
Differentiate to get the boundary condition (see the More Mathematical Explanation section):
Substitute Eq 2 into Eq 1 to eliminate t, after doing some algebra we can get:
 ,
which gives us a parabolic envelope of the particles' trajectories.
As we have discussed before, this is not true for all fireworks. Because of air friction, most fireworks have an envelope more like a sphere. Nonetheless, this parabolic pattern can be seen somewhere else, such as fountains or explosions. This analysis is also useful in the study of "safe domains" in projectile motion^{[8]}.
Teaching Materials
 There are currently no teaching materials for this page. Add teaching materials.
Related Links
Additional Resources
 1.http://jwilson.coe.uga.edu/Texts.Folder/Envel/envelopes.html. I used this page as a starting point.
 2.http://poncelet.math.nthu.edu.tw/disk3/summer01/work/861/02/ex2.html. Here are some animations for more cool envelopes.
 3.http://www.dynamicgeometry.com/. This is a very helpful geometric software called Geometer's Sketchpad. I used this software to create most of my pictures.
References
 ↑ Lemniscate of Bernoulli, from Wikipedia. This is an introduction to Lemniscate and how it was discovered.
 ↑ Simson Line, from Wikipedia. This is a simple proof of the existence of WallaceSimson line.
 ↑ M. de Guzman, 2001, A simple proof of the Steiner theorem on the deltoid. This is a simplified version of Jakob Steiner's proof.
 ↑ Envelope, from Wikipedia. This page was particularly helpful for me in the More Mathematical Explanation section. It also has proof for some more envelopes.
 ↑ Martin J. Osborne, Mathematical methods for economic theory: a tutorial by Martin J. Osborne, 2011. This is a brief introduction to Envelope Theorem in Microeconomics.
 ↑ Amplitude Modulation Broadcasting, from Wikipedia. This page is a more extensive introduction to AM broadcasting.
 ↑ Trajectory, from Wikipedia. This is the physics behind projectile motions.
 ↑ JeanMarc Richard, Safe domain and elementary geometry, 2008. This is a study about safe domains in projectile motion.
Future Directions for this Page
.
Leave a message on the discussion page by clicking the 'discussion' tab at the top of this image page.