# Perko pair knots

### From Math Images

Line 350: | Line 350: | ||

}} | }} | ||

+ | |||

+ | ==Dowker notation== | ||

+ | |||

+ | Dowker notation is a way of describing knots with numbers so that anyone else who knows the system can reconstruct the knot. The Dowker notation for the Perko knots will be determined below. | ||

+ | |||

+ | {{Hide|1= | ||

+ | <div id=direction>[[Image:Perko_Dowker1.gif|right|thumb|250px|[[Perko pair knots#direction|Image 1]]. The first Perko knot with direction assigned.]]</div> | ||

+ | <div id=numbers>[[Image:Perko_Dowker.gif|right|thumb|250px|[[#numbers|Image 2]]. The knot with numbers assigned to the crossings. Orange numbers are assigned when going over a crossing, pink numbers are assigned when going under.]]</div> | ||

+ | To determine a knot's Dowker representation, first we need to assign direction to the knot. This is shown in [[#direction|Image 1]]. | ||

+ | |||

+ | Next, we pick any crossing, and assign the number 1 to it. We follow the understrand out of this crossing, and travel around the knot in the direction specified by our arrows. Every time we encounter a crossing, we assign the next number to it. If we're on an even number, and we're going ''under'' a crossing, we assign a negative number instead. In [[#numbers|Image 2]], we can see that the second number is -2 instead of 2, because it is assigned while going under. | ||

+ | |||

+ | We continue all the way around the knot until every crossing has two numbers, as shown in [[#numbers|Image 2]]. | ||

+ | |||

|AuthorName= | |AuthorName= | ||

Diana Patton | Diana Patton |

## Revision as of 10:17, 19 July 2011

{{Image Description
|ImageName=Perko pair knots
|Image=Perko knots.gif
|ImageIntro=This is a picture of the Perko pair knots. They were first thought to be separate knots, but in 1974 it was proved that they were actually the same knot.
|ImageDescElem=In 1899, C. N. Little published a table of 43 nonalternating knots of 10 crossings that listed the two knots shown above as being distinct. Seventy-five years later, Kenneth Perko, a lawyer and part-time mathematician, discovered that these were actually the same knot^{[1]}.

To say that two knots are the same is to say that one can be deformed into the other without breaking the knot or passing it through itself. To prove that two knots are the same, we can create one of them out of actual rope, and tug at it and move it around until it looks like the other. As the story goes, that's how Perko figured out that these knots are the same - by working with rope on his floor.

We can also prove that two knots are the same by working with their projections. A **projection** of a knot is a flat representation of it, essentially a 2D drawing of the knot. There are many ways to use projections to show that certain knots are distinct from each other, but the main way of using projections to demonstrate that two knots are the same is to use the Reidemeister moves, which are described below.
|ImageDesc===Reidemeister moves==

As was stated above, knots are considered to be the same if one can be rearranged into the other without breaking the string or passing it through itself. This kind of transformation is called an **ambient isotopy**. But when we're writing a written proof, we have to work with the knots projection, instead of the knot itself. What manipulations can we make on a knot’s projection that correspond to ambient isotopies in three dimensions?

The first answer is a planar isotopy. A **planar isotopy** is the sort of transformation you could make if the projection of a knot was printed on very stretchy rubber. The image can be stretched in all directions, but none of the crossings are affected:

| ||||

The original image. |
These two images are planar isotopies of the original image. |
This is |

The second answer is the **Reidemeister moves**, a set of three changes we can make to a knot’s projection that do affect the knot’s crossings but are still ambient isotopies. Every change to a knot's projection that corresponds to an ambient isotopy can be described as some combination of these three moves. In the images below, we imagine that the line segments continue and connect in some sort of unspecified knot, and only the section of the knot we're looking at changes:

## Proving that the Perko knots are equivalent

In his paper "On the Classification of Knots", Kenneth Perko provided an abridged proof that the knots now known as the Perko pair are the same^{[2]}. This proof is shown below:

Perko's proof relies on the ability of the reader to manipulate the knots in their head and verify that each projection can be manipulated to look like the next. To create a full, rigorous proof, we need to use planar isotopies and the Reidmeister moves, as described above.

Below is a step-by-step Reidemeister moves proof that follows the outline of Perko's shorter proof. The arrows between each step are labeled to show how we get from one image to the other: *p.i.* means we use a planar isotopy, *I* means we use the first Reidemeister move, *II* means we use the second move, and *III* means we use the third move. Mousing over a step will highlight the part of the knot that's about to move in pink, and display a dotted green line showing where it will move to.

## Dowker notation

Dowker notation is a way of describing knots with numbers so that anyone else who knows the system can reconstruct the knot. The Dowker notation for the Perko knots will be determined below.