| Discussion: | All Topics |
| Topic: | Midsegment of a rectangle? |
| Related Item: | http://mathforum.org/mathtools/tool/15621/ |
| Post a new topic to the tool: Dynamic Geometry Exploration: Properties of the Midsegment of a Trapezoid discussion |
| ||||||||
| Subject: | RE: More on What is a Trapezoid |
| Author: | Craig |
| Date: | Jan 3 2005 |
Sorry, but how do your reach
> that conclusion? An Isosceles trapezoid [although I've never heard
> the term applied to other than the triangle], isn't *any* trapezoid,
> but one in particular, as the square isn't any rectangle, but one in
> particular. If by Isosceles trapezoid you mean one with base angles
> equal, "any parallelogram" does not have two base angles equal, but
> only the "rectangular parallelogram" has that property. So all
> rectangles would be "isosceles trapezoids", but not all
> parallelograms.
The definition given for an isosceles trapezoid was "a trapezoid with congruent
legs." Hence the theorem about congruent base angles, which can apply only in
the "exclusive" version of trapezoids: If parallelograms are trapezoids, then,
since (whichever "base" you use) the legs are congruent, the parallelogram is an
isosceles trapezoid; the rectangle is the only parallelogram which would fit the
theorem about congruent base angles.
| |||||||
| Post a new topic to the tool: Dynamic Geometry Exploration: Properties of the Midsegment of a Trapezoid discussion | |||||||
| Visit related
discussions: Dynamic Geometry Exploration: Properties of the Midsegment of a Trapezoid tool | |||||||