| Discussion: | All Topics |
| Topic: | Is a rhombus a kite? |
| Post a new topic to the General Discussion in Geometry discussion |
| ||||||||
| Subject: | RE: Is a rhombus a kite? |
| Author: | Pi |
| Date: | May 20 2005 |
> The definition I use for a kite is that it is a quadrilateral that
> has two pair of distinct congruent consecutive sides. Therefore I
> would say a rhombus is not a kite since it is an equilateral
> quadrilateral.
I can relate to Susan's question about the rhombus and the kite. I find that
people get confused because some textbooks list the rhombus as a kite or doesn't
mention kite at all.
I think we should leave the definition of a kite as a toy that blows in the
wind; any four sided figure should be classified as a quadrilateral. All joking
a side, I agree with Tusk definition of a kite. I am part of a research group
and had to post a message.
| |||||||
| Post a new topic to the General Discussion in Geometry discussion | |||||||
| Visit related
discussions: Geometry | |||||||