| Discussion: | All Topics |
| Topic: | Is a rhombus a kite? |
| Post a new topic to the General Discussion in Geometry discussion |
| ||||||||
| Subject: | RE: Is a rhombus a kite? |
| Author: | patb |
| Date: | Apr 21 2008 |
about "kites" but rather "deltoids" and a deltoid by definition is a
quadrilateral with two pairs of congruent adjacent sides (whether or not
distinct depends on the book...).
My question: Does the "standard" definition of quadrilateral assume
convexness?
-----------------------
I think in many high school geometry textbooks they will make some statement
early in the book that all polygons are to be assumed convex unless otherwise
stated...
I think this is a mistake, but I'm not sure I have convinced anyone to change
this approach.
As for the name of the "concave kite" I have referred to it as a dart and
arrowhead.
In the link I posted previously, I note that Proclus calls the dart shape a
four-sided triangle, and other ancients called it a "barb" or a
"hollow-angle". Unfortunatly I did not make a note of where I picked up that
delicious bit of information, so use with caution.
Pat
| |||||||
| Post a new topic to the General Discussion in Geometry discussion | |||||||
| Visit related
discussions: Geometry | |||||||