You are not logged in.

 Discussion: Dynamic Geometry Exploration: Properties of the Midsegment of a Trapezoid tool Topic: Midsegment of a rectangle? Related Item: http://mathforum.org/mathtools/tool/15621/

 Post a new topic to the Dynamic Geometry Exploration: Properties of the Midsegment of a Trapezoid tool Discussion discussion
 << see all messages in this topic < previous message | next message >

 Subject: RE: Midsegment of a rectangle? Author: Mathman Date: Dec 9 2004
On Dec  8 2004, Alan Cooper wrote:
> ...and then there's the follow-up question ("part (b)" if you like):
> Is it possible to find *any* non-trapezoidal example of a
> quadrilateral for which the distance between the midpoints of two
> non-adjacent sides is equal to the average of the lengths of the
> other two sides?

Alan

P.S. I am firmly in the camp of those
> who consider parallelograms to be trapezoidal so I wouldn't consider
> a parallelogram or rectangle to be examples of what I am asking for.

In a word, "No."  If it's a general quadrilateral, it does not work in general.
That is; it does not work for *all* quadrilaterals.  The only distinction
between the general quadrilateral and any other quadrilateral is to do with
parallelism.  Either one pair or two pairs are parallel ...and there are only
four sides, so that' it.  That is, a quadrilateral is a trapezoid, or it is
not.

To show that it is not true in general, consider the reverse theorem of the
divided triangle as a simpler example:  If, in triangle ABC, DE is such that D
is the midpoint of AB, and E the midpoint of AC, then DE is parallel and half of
BC.  ...Otherwise, it is not.  The quadrilateral can be divided into two
triangles and then looked at from that point of view.  The thing is that similar
figures [equal angles/parallel lines] are necessary for the relationship to
hold, and joining midpoints does not do that in general.

An interesting sidetrack:  If you join the midpoints of any quadrilateral to
make a quadrilateral, it will be a parallelogram.

David.