Discussion:  Traffic Jam Applet tool 
Topic:  Fractions, concept and calculations 
Related Item:  http://mathforum.org/mathtools/tool/10/ 
Post a new topic to the Traffic Jam Applet tool Discussion discussion 

Subject:  RE: Fractions, concept and calculations 
Author:  ten frame lady 
Date:  Oct 27 2004 
fractions! Study after study has shown that memorizing without some clue as to
the concept does not last very long.
1. One problem we teachers have to overcome is the impulse to do too much
"giving the best explanation possible" at the expense of too little
encouragement to students that they themselves can make sense of fractions.
If we as teachers do not take the time and trouble to dig into fractions
concepts with our students, we send them along into algebra with halfbaked
notions and a firm belief that they are "no good at math." AND If we want our
students to make sense of fractions, then we also have to dig deeper into our
own understanding.
2. There are some excellent resources to help teachers guide their students
through activities that make sense of fractions. One of the best ones I know is
"Understanding Fractions" by Christine Losq (available from Great Source
Education Group). This resource not only provides conceptbuilding activities
that dig into the meaning of fractions, but also shows you how students
responded, what insights they gained, what insights the teachers gained from the
students' work (misconceptions as well as discoveries).
The original query on this web site involved comparing the fractions 6/7 and
7/6. Before getting into any kind of arithmetic strategies, I ask kids to simply
picture what these fractions represent. I need to know that my students can
translate 6/7 and 7/6 into meaningful and accurate pictures and have the
language to describe those pictures. For example, I first have students "help me
see" the meaning of 6 out of 7 equal parts (they usually draw a pie, simulate 7
equal parts, and shade 6 of them). Then I say, "show me 1 sixth, 2 sixths, 3
sixths" etc. until kids realize that 7/6 is 6/6 plus one more sixth. So they
realize the 7/6 is greater than 1. After that, the comparison between 6/7 and
7/6 is easy. I usually follow with some similar examples (comparing a fraction
less than 1 with a fraction that represents a quantity that is greater than 1).
I want them to recognize that when the numerator is greater than the
denominator, the expression is greater than 1. We then point out that there are
several things to look out for when dealing with a fraction: all the possible
the relationships between the numerator and the denominator; the relative size
of the fractional part represented by each denominator.
NOTE: I find number line models less useful because you already have to know a
lot about fractions in order to successfully situate a fraction on a number
line. And many fractions we run into in our textbooks (like sevenths) are really
hard to show on a number line for comparison purposes.
3. Be sure to emphasize the importance of language in developing an
understanding of fractions.
For example, when you teach division of a fraction by a fraction, start with a
whole number example to set up the language.
8÷4 = ? means "how many groups of 4 can I take out of 8?" (There are 2 groups of
4 in 8, so the quotient is 2 and means 2 groups of 8.) Be sure to remind
students that the = means two different ways to show the same quantity and that
the quotient is not just a random number but a unit of measure, in this case
"groups of 4."
Apply the same language to division of a whole number by a fraction and the
result makes sense. For example,
8 ÷ 1/2 means "how many halves can I take out of 8 wholes?" The answer, 16, now
makes sense because there are 16 halves in 8 wholes. When you have student model
this kind of division problem with simple manipulatives like paper fraction
wheels or fraction bars that they can cut up and mark, they will focus on the
underlying meaning of the numerical expression and of the operation.
The application of language to division of a fraction by a fraction also works.
3/4 ÷ 1/2 means "how many onehalf size pieces can I take out of a 3/4 size
piece?" (The quotient, 1 1/2 (halfsize pieces), then makes sense. Again,
give kids the time to model the logic of the division to find out that you can
take out 1 onehalf size piece and half of a onehalf size piece.)
It does take close attention to what the quotient means because the idea of a
"whole unit" has a double meaning when you get into division of fractions by
fractions: You are dealing with less than one whole unit, since you only have
3/4 to start. The divisor, 1/2, functions both as a quantity related to the
original whole and as the unit that defines the quotient (1 and 1/2 halfsize
pieces are in a 3/4 size piece of a whole).
4. Pie models and pictures really do help to reinforce the language connection
and the underlying concept, although I have a hard time sometimes convincing my
stressed middle school colleagues that this is so. So don't skimp on the time it
takes to let the concept sink in.
5. If we take the time to really explore fractions concepts, students will be
able to answer for themselves why, when you divide a whole number by a fraction
you seem to end up with "more than what you started with" and why, when you
divide a fraction by a fraction, the quotient sometimes appears to be "more"
than what you started with.
7. The mental math involved is the ultimate goal, of course. And the "invert
and multiply" rule is the shortcut we want all of our students to eventually be
masterful with. However, if we just "give the best explanation possible" and
focus too quickly on the underlying factoring and computational skills, we will
NEVER help our student truly understand fractions.
Most important: Kids really will rise to the challenge if you constantly
communicate your belief in their abilities to dig into and understand the
language and logic of math.
On Oct 27 2004, ihor wrote:
> Hi,
> All I've been able to do is to give the best
> explanation
> possible, and let their individual intuition work and develop. I
>
> don't think I can teach to improve that. I can show different,
> perhaps
> better
> ways to do one thing or another, but the
> arithmetic of fractions [not
> necessarily the physical
> representation] does eventually boil down to
> memorising
>
> method, with or without deeper understanding.
I'm with you all
> the way until you got to memorizing with or without understanding.
> Unfortunately, most people come away with the latter. I think that
> is collectively our fault that we have not been able to come up with
> better ways to help students learn it. And you may be right, it may
> not be possible to have the majority of students understand what
> they are doing. Most of them will go through the motions to pass the
> test just like all the generations before them. But I'm an optimist
> I think more kids can understand and appreciate the math they are
> learning and its not just the kids that are good at it or like math.
> I watched a lot of teachers over the years who find ways to do it
> and I think their teaching secrets (their pedagogical content
> knowledge) ought to be shared as much as possible. Otherwise we give
> up too soon and let average kids go through those same semi
> productive hoops. As a good friend of mine once told me when he was
> arguing the point of just getting by: "Look at me I was terrible at
> math, but I mangaged to be successful as a lawyer." I would say he
> became a lawyer despite the handicap of his math skills and it
> didn't have to be that way. (What he really meant to say was that he
> was "terrible" because he didn't understand it, not because he
> couldn't "do it."
>Ability to recognise the same
> pattern and
> thus the same approach to solution in rational algebra pays off
>
> as
> the skill through practice [at what point DO they understand?]
> puts the
> method
> into automode as the larger problem develops
> into a solution. I'm comparing
> that to practicing scales on the
> piano. .... however intuitive it becomes, and not having to think
> about where to place fingers allows for other, better things to
> develop more naturally in the long run. All can learn to play, but
> not all can learn to play well,
> no
> matter the teacher.
One
> of the most formative experiences of my life was taking piano
> lessons for 3 years: It was the ultimate drill and kill experience
> because the teaching was so uninspiring that I actually avoided
> contact with any form of music for years. Fortunately, it was not
> life threatening... I do enjoy all kinds of music today and even
> learned to play a little guitar in my later years. I don't have kids
> of my own but I did watch closely my niece and nephews grow up all
> taking years of music lessons from a good teacher. Only one of them
> became reasonably good at it, but the others enjoyed the experience
> of learning to play. (I'm jealous.)
Ihor
 
Post a new topic to the Traffic Jam Applet tool Discussion discussion  