Learning from Teaching Cases - Middle School Focus Summary
Monday - Friday, July 7 - 11, 2008
Monday & Tuesday
Both the Middle School and High School participants worked together on a list of
"smartnesses" for math. We defined what the group is about.
We also thought about four of our own students and shared what their smartnesses
were, how they were perceived academically, socially, and how they actually
performed in class.
Thursday - Middle School
We talked about a lesson on video and then we talked about all the different things
that can happen while teaching a lesson. The lesson on video was a math activity
about a linear relationship between the consumption of coffee during days traveled.
One of the things that we talked about was about making groups and we liked the idea
of creating a facilitator, a team captain, a resource monitor, and
recorder/reporter. The strategy is that all the facilitators get together in a group
and the team captains get together in another group and so on respectively. When
those groups finish their problems they go back to their original groups to explain
the problems to the rest of their group and so they won't get, all the group get
Another thing we talked about was strategies on how to keep the groups honest by
taking participation quizzes and the grade posted for the groups to see so that they
get motivated and start talking to each other. Shuffle quizzes are also used to keep
the groups working by the group randomly choosing who will be presenting the problem
to everyone else. One more thing that was very important while we were talking about
groups was the fact that sometimes student don't know basic arithmetic skills
therefore they don't solve problems correctly but when they move on to other
concepts, these students excel and so the saying was that we should not let these
basic arithmetic skills be the gatekeepers for higher education. Lastly, we talked
about student's different ways of learning and that we as teachers need to know
because many students are quiet and others are verbal and yet others are visual so
we need to know so that we can reward these students accordingly.
Friday - Middle School
We discussed our responses to the article "A New Lens on Teaching: Learning to
Notice," which described several methods we as teachers can begin noticing and
reflecting more deeply on our practices and what is happening in our classrooms.
Issues of interest in our discussion included
- the importance of continuing reflection on one's practice, even after many years
- the difficulty of fitting in time for observation and reflection, along with all
our other duties
- the importance of realizing, as we set priorities, that observation and reflection
are not simply personal goals for our own interest, but are essential tools for
continuing to improve our ability to meet our students' needs
- how some more "private" and autonomous observation methods can be made more
interactive and collaborative
We next watched the video "Group Test" from Teaching Math: A Video Library
produced by Annenberg Media. This led to an extensive discussion about the nature of
teaching in today's math classroom. Discussion topics included the challenges of
motiviating students, adaptation of curriculum to student needs, and effective
Our discussion ended with reiteration of what we all know about teaching: that the
best teaching begins with connecting with and caring about students.
Homework: Read article about group-worthy tasks. Think about group project.
Back to Journal Index
PCMI@MathForum Home || IAS/PCMI Home
© 2001 - 2013 Park City Mathematics Institute
IAS/Park City Mathematics Institute is an outreach program of the School of Mathematics
at the Institute for Advanced Study, Einstein Drive, Princeton, NJ 08540
Send questions or comments to: Suzanne Alejandre and Jim King
With program support provided by Math for America
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0314808.
Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed
in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect
the views of the National Science Foundation.