Solutions
Annie says:
What a week: 45 right answers and 57 wrong, and 23 people got the exact same wrong answer! This caused me to reevaluate my own effort, but then I figured out what was going on, and it's a bummer that so many folks were making the same wrong assumptions, which are so clearly impossible. Yes, I realize they might not have been "clearly impossible" to everyone, but some of the folks who got it wrong had pictures that showed that it wouldn't work!
Here's what those 23 people did wrong. They assumed that the belts were only in contact with half of the wheels. Why isn't this true? Because we know that the belts are tangent to the wheels at some point, and that anything tangent to a circle is perpendicular to the radius at that point. So if we have two pieces of the belt coming off the wheel halfway around, then both pieces are perpendicular to the same diameter, and so the two belts are parallel, and they'll never cross! And if you draw them so that they do cross, right from the tops and bottoms of the wheels, then the belts cut through the wheels, which just won't work - this is what a number of folks drew, and they still figured it would work.

So that lost them some length - which they almost gained back when figuring the lengths of the straight parts of the belts. What initially confused me about the answers was that while the right answer is 114.79 cm, the common wrong answer was 114.206 cm. Those answers are pretty close.
If you draw a correct picture (with the belts covering about 2/3 of the wheels), you see that we still have right triangles, but the right angle is at the point of tangency, and since the radius is 9 and the hypotenuse is 18, we have a 30-60-90 triangle, and so everything is very neat and tidy - you don't even need the Pythagorean theorem if you remember enough about 30-60-90 triangles.

Is there a moral to all of this? I guess it's just to think things through carefully and see if your assumptions and your pictures make sense before doing all of the math.
Following are some highlighted solutions. The names of all the people who submitted correct solutions and most of the solutions are also available. There are some very nice ones, so I encourage you to read through them. We also have two new schools, including our first solution from Italy!
Thomas S. Kuo
Grade: 7
School: Murray Junior High School, Ridgecrest, California
A
*
* * B
* * C
* * * *
* * * D * *
* * * * *
* * * * * *
* * * * * *
* * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
E O F
E is the center of the big wheel with diameter 18 cm.
F is the center of the small wheel with diameter 12 cm.
O is the cross point of line between the top of the big
wheel to the bottom of the small wheel and line between the
top of the small wheel and the bottom of the big wheel.
Line OB is tangent to the big wheel at point B.
Line OC is tangent to the small wheel at point D.
angle AEO = angle EBO = angle OFC = angle FDO = 90 degrees
EF = 30 cm
EO = 18 cm, EA = EB = 9 cm
FO = 12 cm, FC = FD = 6 cm
For the big wheel:
1. EB^2 + BO^2 = EO^2
9^2 + BO^2 = 18^2
BO = sqrt(243) ~ 15.59 cm
2. The distance around the semicircle of the big wheel is
(1/2) * 18 pi = 9 pi
3. angle AEB = angle BOE = arc sin (BE/EO) = arc sin (9/18)
= arc sin (1/2) = 30 degrees
arc AB = 18 pi * (30/360) = (3/2) pi cm
4. The total length starts O, goes around the big wheel, returns
to O is
2 * (15.59 + (3/2) pi) + 9 pi = 31.18 + 12 pi ~ 68.88 cm
Similarly for the small wheel:
5. OD^2 + DF^2 = OF^2
OD^2 + 6^2 = 12^2
OD = sqrt(108) ~ 10.39 cm
6. The distance around the semicircle of the small wheel is
(1/2) * 12 pi = 6 pi
7. angle CFD = angle DOF = arc sin (DF/OF) = arc sin (6/12)
= arc sin (1/2) = 30 degrees
arc CD = 12 pi * (30/360) = pi
8. The total length starts O, goes around the small wheel, returns
to O is
2 * (10.39 + pi) + 6 pi = 20.78 + 8 pi ~ 45.92 cm
Length of the belt:
9. 68.88 + 45.92 ~ 114.80 cm
Greg Paul
Grade 12
Fairfield High School, Fairfield, CT
The length of the belt is 114.793 centimeters.
First draw a line from the center of the circle with radius 9 to its
tangent point. We know that the angle between that line and the line
from the tangent to where the belts cross is 90 degrees. Let the
center of the circle be point A, the tangent point be B and where the
belt crosses be C. We know AB is 9 and AC is 18, then we know
that inverse sin (9/18) is 60 degrees; therefore, triangle ABC is a
30-60-90 triangle.
Then we can set up a proportion to find the length of the belt around
the wheel. 360/18pi = 60/x. x turns out to be 3pi. Double 3pi and
get 6pi. This is the length where the belt does not touch the wheel.
Subtract this from 18pi giving you 12pi. The length of the
hypotenuse of triangle ABC is 9*sqrt(3) because it is the radius times
sqrt(3) in a 30-60-90 triangle. Double that to get 18*sqrt(3) for
both sides of the belt since tangent segments from the same external
point are equal. Set up proportions to get the measurements for the
other circle.
Total length of the belt is 12pi + 8pi + 18*sqrt(3) + 12*sqrt(3) =
114.793 centimeters.
Rita Beckner
Grade 9
Franklin County High School, Rocky Mount, Virginia
It sounds as though your car really has a problem. It would be much
easier to look in a parts manual to find the length of the belt, but if
you don't have one, here is how to find the length of the belt:
Statements Reasons
NB=18, OK=12 given
CK=6, AB=9 diameter = 2radius
JA=9, CI=6 radii of a circle are congruent
JK is tangent to c1, c2 given
BI is tangent to c1, c2 given
AB is perp. to BI, AJ is perp. to JK radii perp. to intersecting tangents
JK is perp. to KC, CI is perp. to IB radii perp. to intersecting tangents
angle B, angle J, angle K, angle I rt. perp lines form rt. angles
Measure angle B=90, measure angle J=90 rt. angles are 90 degrees
measure angle K=90, measure angle I=90 rt. angles are 90 degrees
AE=18 given
AC=AE+EC segment addition postulate
AC=30 given
30=18+EC substitution
12=EC subtraction of equality
EK squared+KC squared=EC squared Pythagorean theorem
CI squared+IE squared=CE squared Pythagorean theorem
AB squared+BE squared=AE squared Pythagorean theorem
AJ squared+JE squared=AE squared Pythagorean theorem
EK squared+6 squared=12 squared substitution
IE squared+6 squared=12 squared substitution
BE squared+9 squared=18 squared substitution
JE squared+9 squared=18 squared substitution
EK squared+36=144 substitution
36+EK squared=144 substitution
BE squared+81=324 substitution
JE squared+81=324 substitution
JE+9 radical 3 substitution
BE=9 radical 3 substitution
IE=6 radical 3 substitution
EK=6 radical 3 substitution
cosine BAM, JAM= 9/18 cosine=adjacent leg/hypotenuse
measure angle BAM, measure angle JAM=60 Definition cosine
cosine LCK, LCI=6/12 cosine=adjacent leg/hypotenuse
measure angle BAM+ JAM=measure angle BAJ angle addition postulate
measure angle LCK+ LCI=measure angle KCI angle addition postulate
60+60=measure angle BAJ substitution
60+60=measure angle KCI substitution
measure angle BAJ, KCI = 120 substitution
circle C, A = 360 degrees degrees of a circle = 360
360-120=arc BPJ measure of major arc=360-minor arc
360-120=arc KDI measure of major arc=360-minor arc
arc BPJ, KDI=240 substitution
240/360= portion of circle=major arc substitution
pi(18)(2/3)= major arc perimeter circumference=pi(diameter)
pi(12)(2/3)= major arc perimeter circumference=pi(diameter)
37.7, 25.5=arc perimeter substitution
arc BPJ+arc KDI+IE+EK+EB+JE= segment addition postulate
length of belt
37.7+25.1+6 radical 3+6 radical 3+ substitution
9 radical 3+9 radical 3=
length of belt
length of belt=114.8 centimeters substitution
From: peterson@eng16.rochny.uspra.abb.com
Dave Peterson
Grade 5 homeschool teacher
Rochester, NY
It turns out that we were given one extra piece of information in this
problem, namely the location of the belt crossing, which isn't really
needed and which I can figure out from the rest of the data. The car
manufacturer also was nice enough to give us a very convenient
shape, so we don't have to use any inverse trigonometric functions as
I would have expected.
I'll start with the straight parts of the belt. If I draw just one of
these, I see two (similar) triangles bounded by the radii of the
wheels, the line between the centers, and the belt (which is tangent to
both circles, and therefore perpendicular to both radii):
/\
/\/ \
9 / \ belt
/ \ 12
/________________\____________
18 \ /
\ /\/ 6
\/
But rather than work with these two triangles, I can change it into just
one big triangle by constructing a rectangle above the diagonal belt:
/\
6 /\/ \
/ \
/\ \ =belt
/\/ \ \
9 / \ belt \
/ \ \
/________________\___________\
30 \ /
\ /\/ 6
\/
Now I don't need to use the distance to the crossing, but only the two
radii, which give 15 cm for the length of one leg, and the distance
between the wheels, which gives 30 cm for the hypotenuse. The
length of each straight section is then
sqrt(30^2 - 15^2)
= sqrt(675)
= sqrt(15*15*3)
= 15 * sqrt(3)
Next, I notice that with the hypotenuse twice as long as the leg and
this triangle is half of an equilateral triangle, so the angle at left is
60 degrees. The arc of each wheel taken up by the belt is therefore
360 - 2 * 60 = 240 degrees, and the length of each arc is 2/3 of the
circumference of the wheel (2*PI*r), or 2*PI*9*2/3 and
2*PI*6*2/3 for the left and right wheel respectively.
The total length therefore is the sum of two equal straight sections
and two different arcs:
30*sqrt(3) + 12*PI + 8*PI
= 30*1.7321 + 20*3.1416
= 114.79 cm
(As a sanity check, the perimeter of a rectangle around the whole
belt would be 18 by 45, or 126 cm, which is close.)
For extra credit, to determine the location of the crossing if it were
not given (or to check the value that was given), the two similar
triangles in my figure give (with x = distance from the center of the
left wheel to the crossing)
x 30 - x
--- = ------
9 6
so 6 * x = 270 - 9 * x
15 * x = 270
x = 18 cm as given.