
Dividing the Land - May 23-27, 1994
Two contractors, Jamal and Jacob, are trying to divide up a piece of land. The land is an
irregular quadrilateral. Jamal decides he might be able to get something out of this,
because Jacob doesn't seem too good with areas. Jamal says, "Let's draw the line AC,
with you getting triangle ABC and me getting triangle ACD." Now, even Jacob knew
this wasn't a good deal. So then Jamal said, "What if we draw another diagonal, BD? If
AC and BD meet at E, you get AED and BEC, and I get AEB and CED." Jacob pondered
this for a while, and figured out that the sums of the areas still weren't equal. "But,"
Jamal said, "the product of the areas is equal!" Jacob was stumped, and didn't really
understand, so he agreed to the deal because it sounded really impressive.
Is Jamal's claim about the products true for all quadrilaterals? Is this a fair way to divide
the land? Why or why not?
Extra: Come up with a way to divide an irregular quadrilateral using
only two segments so that the four regions can be shared equally.
These folks got the initial part right, and decided that it wasn't fair, but didn't do the extra
part (or did it but weren't right):
The following person got it all right, but is a college professor, so he gets his own listing
:-)
- Robert Dawson Dept. of Math &
Computing Science, St. Mary's University

Next problem ||
Previous problem ||
Table of Contents ||
Forum Home Page

|