Teacher2Teacher Q&A #1154

Teachers' Lounge Discussion: Front End Estimation

T2T || FAQ || Ask T2T || Teachers' Lounge || Browse || Search || T2T Associates || About T2T

View entire discussion
[<< prev] [ next >>]

From: Xun Chen

To: Teacher2Teacher Public Discussion
Date: 2001092422:38:28
Subject: More on Front End Estimation

Thank you for your feedback, but you didn't get to the point. To show an extreme case, considering \$182,804,050.32 + \$1, if we use the method I shown in my first question, we will come up with a range of \$100,000,001 as the lower end, and \$200000002 as the higher end. Yes, the real number is indeed inside the ranges derived from various approaches, but which what gives a more suitable picture of it? My believe is if we use front-end estimation and expect it to be useful, we should make sure the numbers are in the same order. A good example will be like: \$290.94 + \$146.53+ \$313.83 If they are not in the same order, I suggest either zero be added to the left side of the number, so that they appear in the same order, Question 13) \$290.94 + \$104.53 + \$3.83 will become \$290.94 + \$104.53 + \$003.83 Thus, when we apply the current method, we will get 200+100+0 for the lower end and 300+200+100 for the higher end for the range. Or, more than one digit be used in this method, in our case, using two digits will be very reasonable. Question 13) \$290.94 + \$140.53 + \$3.83 will have 290+140+0 for the lower end and 300+150+10 for the higher end for the range.

Teacher2Teacher - T2T ®