T2T || FAQ || Ask T2T || Teachers' Lounge || Browse || Search || Thanks || About T2T
View entire discussion
[<< prev] [ next >>]
From: owen <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: Teacher2Teacher Public Discussion Date: 2008061316:29:10 Subject: Re: Re: The Potential Dangers of Teaching Touch Math To: Manga Lito You said that you are teaching this program and claim it is extremely successful. The problem with your opinion is that your argument is based on your opinion and experience, but not statistical data or research. Many teachers in the higher grades are not happy that you teach touch math. They are the ones that have to help your students recover from the NONstandard symbols that you teach. They don't have time to reteach grade 1-4 before they can teach high school school math so your students can get lost and left behind. You asked if rote memory is a better alternative. In 1966 I made my first version of "DotMath" and I had the dots on top of the numbers. It took me many years to recover from doing that so I don't think children will recover from your lessons without a great deal of help. To answer your question: Yes I think rote would be better than touch math, but you must give them something to memorize. If you are interested to see some research then look up the "DotMath for kids" web site. Just type "dotMath for kids" into the search box and it will help you find the site. You should not torture young 5 and 6 year old children with countless hours of torturous memorization. You will find on the site "The Fun Book" that helps explain what a number is and how to make a "universal standard number symbol" with "dots around" the number and NOT ON the number symbol. If you give them this information and charts to memorize they will have fun and learn it fast and remember it longer. These charts are free to copy as I have no way to find everyone I taught my first verson to. I want to help them recover from my first version that had the dots on top of the number symbol.
Math Forum Home || The Math Library || Quick Reference || Math Forum Search