Teacher2Teacher 
Q&A #18119 
View entire discussion [<< prev] [ next >>]
From: Wes Bruning <firmeadow@bctonline.com> To: Teacher2Teacher Public Discussion Date: 2008043023:01:51 Subject: "Bottoms up" factoring trinomials I have been teaching this method of factoring trinomials for a number of years. It is commonly referred to as the "ac method" due to mn=ac step. A number of texts include it. My school has chosen to include it in the 2nd Algebra term. However, I do not recommend it to students. Actually, I discourage its use. The ac method us useful for trinomials that have something other than a 1 for the x^2 term and have multiple factors for both a and c (ax^2 + bx + c). This can be a tough factorization problem. BUT, the problem is that one has to be able to guess a pair or numbers (m and n) that when multiplied equal ac and when added equal b. How often does this occur? Never outside of the math classroom. If m or n is not a whole number they cannot be guessed. The method is so restrictive it is worthless. At best it is a time wasting method requiring the student to memorize a set of procedures they will never use outside of that particular math class. If one is to spend time learning a procedurebased method of factoring, spend the time on the quadratic formula. The quadratic formula is a tool that works every time and all the time. It is used in many advanced math solutions both theoretical math and practical math. It is used in engineering and other sciences. Spend your time and your student's time and efforts on something with lasting value. The ac method is not it. Wes Bruning Oregon City, OR
Post a reply to this message

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]
Math Forum Home 
The Math Library 
Quick Reference 
Math Forum Search