Q&A #19452

Teachers' Lounge Discussion: Remainders in long division

T2T || FAQ || Ask T2T || Teachers' Lounge || Browse || Search || T2T Associates || About T2T

View entire discussion
[<< prev] [ next >>]

From: Loyd

To: Teacher2Teacher Public Discussion
Date: 2009113012:13:02
Subject: Re: fractions as remainders in long division

On 2009112015:00:58, Megan wrote: >What is the mathematical reasoning behind not using "R" before a >remainder expressed in fraction form? We use an "R" followed by a >whole number to represent a remainder in long division, so why is it >considered "wrong" to write the "R" before representing the remainder >as a fraction. I need to know why the "R" is not acceptable - >"because it is just not done" is not a good enough explanation!!! > >Thank you for your help! > In the first place, R is not used in math much beyond the teaching of fractions. But division is first learned in about the 3rd and 4th grade and the students are not always adapted to thinking in fractions so someone came up with the use of R for the younger students. Gail gave an example of 37 divided by 7. The result is 5 whole groups with a fraction of a group left over. So, the result should be 5 whole groups and a 2/7 of a group left over which we write as 5 and 2/7 = 5 2/7 = 5+2/7. The later being the form that is used in all math at and above the 5th grade. The R means nothing to me in algebra and other higher mathematics. So, one would not write 5 R 2/7 but simply 5+2/7. When someone writes 5 R 2, it neglects the use of the divisor which is 7.

Post a reply to this message
Post a related public discussion message
Ask Teacher2Teacher a new question

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

Math Forum Home || The Math Library || Quick Reference || Math Forum Search

Teacher2Teacher - T2T ®
© 1994- The Math Forum at NCTM. All rights reserved.