T2T || FAQ || Ask T2T || Teachers' Lounge || Browse || Search || Thanks || About T2T
View entire discussion
[<< prev] [ next >>]
From: Loyd <email@example.com> To: Teacher2Teacher Public Discussion Date: 2009113011:13:02 Subject: Re: fractions as remainders in long division On 2009112015:00:58, Megan wrote: >What is the mathematical reasoning behind not using "R" before a >remainder expressed in fraction form? We use an "R" followed by a >whole number to represent a remainder in long division, so why is it >considered "wrong" to write the "R" before representing the remainder >as a fraction. I need to know why the "R" is not acceptable - >"because it is just not done" is not a good enough explanation!!! > >Thank you for your help! > In the first place, R is not used in math much beyond the teaching of fractions. But division is first learned in about the 3rd and 4th grade and the students are not always adapted to thinking in fractions so someone came up with the use of R for the younger students. Gail gave an example of 37 divided by 7. The result is 5 whole groups with a fraction of a group left over. So, the result should be 5 whole groups and a 2/7 of a group left over which we write as 5 and 2/7 = 5 2/7 = 5+2/7. The later being the form that is used in all math at and above the 5th grade. The R means nothing to me in algebra and other higher mathematics. So, one would not write 5 R 2/7 but simply 5+2/7. When someone writes 5 R 2, it neglects the use of the divisor which is 7.
Math Forum Home || The Math Library || Quick Reference || Math Forum Search