![]() |
Teacher2Teacher |
Q&A #2916 |

T2T || FAQ || Ask T2T || Teachers' Lounge || Browse || Search || Thanks || About T2T

|
View entire discussion [<< prev] [ next >>]
From: Dan To: Teacher2Teacher Public Discussion Date: 2003073123:46:53 Subject: Re: Re: Accelerated Math Regarding your comment "-- but I'd have to say an extremely lazy way to teach. You may be out of a job soon if this is so great and more people decide to home school using this program"----------I say "terrific" if you can find a curriculum that doesn't need a teacher, but that is not the case with AM. Instruction is still necessary for most students but it does allow for excellent peer tutoring. AM also does a great job of reviewing and holding student accountable for work done earlier in the year. I am using the "Pre-Algebra" library as a "review curriculum" for my Algebra class and my Geometry class each which I am teaching out of a regular text. It is remarkable how much 'pre-algebra curriculum' that students have forgotten, or simply did not learn. I use the 1st 20 minutes each class to do AM (students are expected to bring a worksheet from home completed and ready to grade, and use the rest of the 20 minutes to work on their new worksheet). Then we get to work on our regular Algebra or Geometry.
Post a reply to this message
|
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

Math Forum Home ||
The Math Library ||
Quick Reference ||
Math Forum Search

The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.