Teacher2Teacher 
Q&A #6233 
View entire discussion [<< prev] [ next >>]
From: Tom Sontag <tsontag99@yahoo.com> To: Teacher2Teacher Public Discussion Date: 2006092508:13:19 Subject: Re: Everyday MathHow to generate support September 25, 2006 Dear Teacher/Evaluator, I am a professional engineer and a father of boys aged 9 and 10. Both use Everyday Math in elementary school. I find that Everday Math contains a limited subset useful teaching, particularly in areas of understanding certain concepts such as charts and figures. These limited strengths do not overcome its deeply imbedded weaknesses. However, I say with the utmost concern that it is an experiment lacking basic and consistent mathematical skills. The kids spend a significant amount of time learning simple concepts in difficult, vacillating and confusing ways. Students have to learn a bunch of nonmathematical nonsense words and conceptual diagrams that simply are unusable in real life. Worse, the nonsense diagrams and words are drilled into their heads instead of the skills. If they do not remember the nonsense words and the diagrams, they are utterly lost. Later the nonsense words are dropped, or other nonsense words appear to describe the next concept. What is wrong with the real words, such as add, subtract, multiply and divide? What is wrong with 5 balls plus 3 balls equals 8 balls? Why does addition have to be shown (yes in the real curriculum) as a "math engine" that looks like a meat grinder, or as a "fact triangle", whatever that is supposed to be. How these high cost programs bought their way into the education department is beyond my imagination, and probably scandalous. Stop experimenting. Stick to what has traditionally worked or our nation will fail. Tom Sontag Fridley, MN
Post a reply to this message

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]
Math Forum Home 
The Math Library 
Quick Reference 
Math Forum Search