Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Last Post

#

Topic

Author


2


Re: Helen Bonham Carter debunks the New Calculus!  A capade by William Gelfand.

bursejan@gmail.com


4


Re: The bogus set concept.

Me


16


huge deep errors in modern math, that need fixing or math dies

plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com


3


Re: The bogus set concept.

bursejan@gmail.com


10


The Lametta Tree

wolfgang.mueckenheim@hsaugsburg.de


1


20_ Are NTNU Norway's Espen Jakobsen, Finn Knudsen, Harald Krogstad as dumb as Konyberg about basic Calculus (see below)

plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com


4


19) Are Princeton's Yong Hou, Tatiana Howard, WuChung Hsiang as dumb as John Gabriel about basic Calculus (see below)

plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com


3


16 Are MIT's Arthur Mattuck, Davesh Maulik, as dumb as Mike Moroney who thinks a conic section is ellipse, when in truth it is a OVAL (see below)

plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com


2


Re: The bogus set concept.

bursejan@gmail.com


2


Re: for all and for every , how to avoid the subtle contradiction on using qualifiers?

bursejan@gmail.com


2


Obvious Falsehood of the Second Law of Thermodynamics

Pentcho Valev


1


1 Is Univ Western Ontario's Gordon Sinnamon, Graham Denham as dumb as Dan Christensen believes Logical Connector AND has truth table TFFF when it really is TTTF (see below)

plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com


12


Re: About the spamming troll John Gabriel in his own words (October 2017)

bursejan@gmail.com


1


prePage25, 32, Coulomb's law as EMgravity; Sun & planets helical motion in space/AtomTotalityUniverse/ textbook 8th ed 2017

plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com


6


for all and for every , how to avoid the subtle contradiction on using qualifiers?

Lee Philip


Denotes unread messages since your last visit.


Denotes updated messages since your last visit.



