Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.*

sci.math.*

Usenet newsgroups about mathematics.

Advanced Search


Discussion Messages Last Post
    Read sci.math 1,395,220 Aug 25, 2016 6:25 PM
    Read sci.math.num-analysis.independent 81,954 Aug 18, 2016 2:22 AM
    Read sci.math.research 34,725 Aug 24, 2016 1:42 PM
    Read sci.math.symbolic.independent 42,021 Aug 23, 2016 10:24 PM
    Read sci.stat.math.independent 87,484 Aug 15, 2016 12:02 AM
    Read sci.stat.edu.independent 2,814 Aug 16, 2012 3:06 PM

Recent topics in these discussions:

Last Post # Topic Author Discussion
8/22/16
17 Read Why 1 has to be the first prime number-- unit prime, and 2,3,5.. are
nonunit primes/ Correcting Math of lousy definitions
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com sci.math
8/21/16
2 Read Re: How we got number - a TRUE story. Dan Christensen sci.math
8/21/16
1 Read Re: I am real. I post under my real name. Most of the filthy cowards
on this site uses aliases or pseudonyms.
Dan Christensen sci.math
8/21/16
1 Read Re: Trying to make sense of Newton's bogus calculus whilst only 14
years old.
Dan Christensen sci.math
8/21/16
1 Read Re: Simplest proof that 0 999 is not well defined as being equal to 1. FredJeffries@gmail.com sci.math
8/21/16
1 Read Re: Simplest proof that 0.999... is well defined as being equal to 1. Python sci.math
8/21/16
2 Read Re: Simplest proof that 0.999... is well defined as being equal to 1. Virgil sci.math
8/21/16
1 Read Re: Simplest proof that 0 999 is not well defined as being equal to 1. FredJeffries@gmail.com sci.math
8/21/16
1 Read Re: Simplest proof that 0.999... is well defined as being equal to 1. Virgil sci.math
8/21/16
1 Read Re: Simplest proof that 0 999 is not well defined as being equal to 1. FredJeffries@gmail.com sci.math
8/21/16
2 Read HELL-LOW! robersi sci.math
8/21/16
1 Read Re: Does Grover's algorithm actually search N unordered items in time O(N^(1/2)? stephenparrottdr@gmail.com sci.math.research
8/21/16
2 Read Re: Simplest proof that 0.999... is well defined as being equal to 1. wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de sci.math
8/21/16
13 Read Re: Simplest proof that 0 999 is not well defined as being equal to 1. Brian Tenneson sci.math
8/21/16
25 Read {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,...} robersi sci.math
Pages: 18674 [ Previous | 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 | Next ]

Denotes unread or updated content since your last visit. Denotes unread or updated content since your last visit.
Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this category

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2016. All Rights Reserved.