The Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Is (Pi) a number, or is (Pi) an angle?
Replies: 14   Last Post: Sep 30, 2017 10:27 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
zelos.malum@gmail.com

Posts: 434
Registered: 9/18/17
Re: Is (Pi) a number, or is (Pi) an angle?
Posted: Sep 18, 2017 4:36 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Den måndag 18 september 2017 kl. 09:36:37 UTC+2 skrev bassam king karzeddin:
> On Saturday, September 16, 2017 at 10:23:15 PM UTC+3, Markus Klyver wrote:
> > Den torsdag 3 augusti 2017 kl. 16:10:00 UTC+2 skrev bassam king karzeddin:
> > > On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 1:11:15 AM UTC+3, Markus Klyver wrote:
> > > > Den onsdag 2 augusti 2017 kl. 17:32:38 UTC+2 skrev bassam king karzeddin:
> > > > > On Wednesday, August 2, 2017 at 4:27:48 PM UTC+3, Markus Klyver wrote:
> > > > > > Den tisdag 18 april 2017 kl. 14:50:12 UTC+2 skrev bassam king karzeddin:
> > > > > > > Which is correct, (Pi) is a number or (Pi) is an angle?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > Bassam King Karzeddin
> > > > > > > 18 th, April, 2017

> > > > > >
> > > > > > Pi is a real number, not an angle. Angles are sometimes measured in radians, but pi radians is not the same as the number pi. Pi radians is an angle, but pi is a number.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do you believe 360 is a number or an angle? Or 90?

> > > > >
> > > > > Sure, (Pi) is a real transcendental number in your (MIND), and not in any physical reality for sure
> > > > > otherwise go ahead and show us (pi) here again
> > > > > BKK

> > > >
> > > > I have said it before, and I say it again: whether something exists in the physical world or not is an empirical question of physics. Mathematics does not deal with physical evidence or physical reality.

> > >
> > > Some mathematics obey the rules OR the principle of existence of physical reality, whereas the vast majority of modern mathematics never comply with any reality, so not all you say is correct, otherwise, it should be made for entertainments for very few peculiar people
> > > BKK

> >
> > So you believe mathematics is useless because it's not empirical? Wow.

>
> No, what I should say more precisely, mathematics is very useful for more practical people not necessarily specialized in abstract mathematics, usually called scientist in various branches in technology who could make real and very successful achievement, they are also more talented in mathematics that the specialised ones almost from early childhood, and so unlike other specialized mathematicians who are generally jugglers and mostly produce fictions, for sure
> BKK


I think waht you meant to say is that you are jealous that mathematicians are smarter than you so you cry like a baby.



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2017. All Rights Reserved.