The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: It is a very bad idea and nothing less than stupid to define 1/3
= 0.333...

Replies: 3   Last Post: Oct 2, 2017 1:43 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 5,511
Registered: 9/25/16
Re: It is a very bad idea and nothing less than stupid to define 1/3
= 0.333...

Posted: Oct 1, 2017 11:12 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Not every forall is induction. Induction works
only for natural numbers.

But the epsilon is a forall over rational numbers
(or real number), what induction do you have in mind.

And why do you call Peano crapaxioms, when nevertheless
you say induction is needed here.

Ever incurred to you that Peano axioms capture
natural numbers and their induction?

Am Sonntag, 1. Oktober 2017 15:17:49 UTC+2 schrieb John Gabriel:
> Each time I think you can't say anything more stupid, you surprise me.
> Listen stupid, the forall you have there is based on induction. There is no forall. A Cauchy sequence does not require "forall". The "forall" is a result of inference.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.