The Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Finally the discussion is over: S = Lim S is a bad definition.
Replies: 5   Last Post: Oct 3, 2017 9:01 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
bursejan@gmail.com

Posts: 4,619
Registered: 9/25/16
Re: Finally the discussion is over: S = Lim S is a bad definition.
Posted: Oct 3, 2017 8:24 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

So whats this Gabriel number:

lim n->oo 0.999...9995 = ?
\---n---/

Am Mittwoch, 4. Oktober 2017 02:08:09 UTC+2 schrieb burs...@gmail.com:
> So if 0.999... <> 1, do we have:
>
> 0.999... < 1
>
> Or rather?
>
> 0.999... > 1
>
> Am Mittwoch, 4. Oktober 2017 01:40:31 UTC+2 schrieb John Gabriel:

> > > nonsense. Right. But this was clear from the beginning.
> >
> > Yes. Of course S = Lim S is nonsense. So why do you still believe in it?





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2017. All Rights Reserved.