Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: It is a very bad idea and nothing less than stupid to define 1/3
= 0.333...

Replies: 9   Last Post: Oct 23, 2017 10:43 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 bursejan@gmail.com Posts: 5,511 Registered: 9/25/16
Re: It is a very bad idea and nothing less than stupid to define 1/3
= 0.333...

Posted: Oct 5, 2017 9:12 AM

There is no S(oo), there is no index n=oo.
Only lim n->oo S(n), which happens is can

be written as sum_i=1^oo a(i). For a definition
see this picture here:

Guiness book of records in stupidity,
bird brain John Gabriel entry
https://gist.github.com/jburse/e60242e2e02e611e4373df55bfc37953#gistcomment-2219906

Its really a definition, there is nothing to
guess, its a mathematical notational convention.

Am Donnerstag, 5. Oktober 2017 05:56:03 UTC+2 schrieb 7777777:
> keskiviikko 4. lokakuuta 2017 17.31.48 UTC+3 burs...@gmail.com kirjoitti:
> > Still struggling with "S=Lim S", your own
> > blunder, bird brain John Gabriel birdbrains?

>
> why don't you answer to my criticism? How do you end up with S(?) = 1?
> You have only shown how S(?) = 0.(9)
> Do you just simply put 0.(9) = 1, but why? It is just because you say so?
> In doing so, can you just put everything that you want to be equal to anything you want? Just because that's what you want.

Date Subject Author
10/4/17 bursejan@gmail.com
10/4/17 7777777
10/5/17 bursejan@gmail.com
10/7/17 7777777
10/7/17 Markus Klyver
10/8/17 netzweltler
10/5/17 Markus Klyver
10/6/17 zelos.malum@gmail.com
10/23/17 jsavard@ecn.ab.ca