>Define what is the null sequence you a real Troll? wonder!
Depends a tad on what construction but for rationls, a null sequence is a cauchy sequence such that for a given \epsilon>0, we can find an N such that when m>N, we have |a_m|<\epsilon
That is a null sequence.
> there isn't any p'th root for any prime number moron (except in the fictional well-fabricated and established mathematics), where (p) is an odd prime number
There is, again, use newton raphner method of root finding and you get a cauchy sequence that gives us the real number which is the root.
> If you can't understand the simplest proofs presented and Published here, then you can't understand any logical result or conclusion
I understand your proofs, they are fundamentally flawed. You are equating exist with a compass and straightedge construction, which is fallacious. If you said "There is no compass and straightedge construction for roots beyond n=2" to which I would say "Congratulation, you figure out something that has been known for 2 centuries"