On Monday, November 6, 2017 at 2:21:29 AM UTC-5, bassam king karzeddin wrote: > Why do we really need those real non-constructible numbers, if it is impossible to express them exactly except only by constructible numbers or as meaningless notation in mind only? >
The troll BKK, like the others here, believes that he can achieve in science and engineering everything that we can do in real analysis using a only a subset of the real numbers. It is really nothing more than an article of faith or religious dogma at this point. So far, he has not been able to demonstrate how his goofy system would work, or that real analysis is, any sense, broken or inconsistent.
Meanwhile, real analysis keeps going from strength to strength as the basis for just about all of modern science and technology. It must be frustrating as hell for BKK and his fellow trolls here, but their various and silly "square wheel" projects don't seem to going anywhere.