bassam king karzeddin wrote: > > Why do we really need those real non-constructible numbers, if it is
Who is "we"? Clearly there is a large class of "we" (certainly most of the human race) who do not need them. What of it?
> impossible to express them exactly except only by constructible > numbers or as meaningless notation in mind only?
-- Do, as a concession to my poor wits, Lord Darlington, just explain to me what you really mean. I think I had better not, Duchess. Nowadays to be intelligible is to be found out. -- Oscar Wilde, Lady Windermere's Fan