Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Sci.math morons still struggling to prove that m+n is ALWAYS a
factor of New Calculus derivative!

Replies: 2   Last Post: Nov 8, 2017 8:09 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Jan Burse Posts: 1,472 Registered: 4/12/05
Re: Sci.math morons still struggling to prove that m+n is ALWAYS a
factor of New Calculus derivative!

Posted: Nov 8, 2017 7:52 PM

As I said MVT can be reduced to find max of a
function g(x), respectively g'(x)=0.

You just provided me a link:

Look at the proof, look at g(x):
https://calculus.subwiki.org/wiki/Lagrange_mean_value_theorem#Proof

Max of a function is not constructive.

Nicht Konstruktiv Beweisbare Sätze der Analysis
Specker, Ernst - J. Symbolic Logic
Volume 14, Issue 3 (1949), 145-158.
https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jsl/1183730665

Thank you very much, was looking for the missing piece.

John Gabriel schrieb:
> On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 13:55:04 UTC-5, burs...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Bird brain John Gabriels nonsense knows no limits (pun intended).
>> theorem whatsoever."
>>
>> The mean value theorem comes up in many facets, even in
>> bird brain John Gabriels famous when John Gabriel
>> was 13 years old:

>
> You'll have to update your Wikipedia Moronica!
>
> https://calculus.subwiki.org/wiki/Lagrange_mean_value_theorem
>
> La Grange (a French poodle) came long after Newton.
>
> This means he was younger you birdbrain!
>
> And guess what? Even he did not provide a proof and certainly did not state the theorem in the UNREMARKABLE way that it is stated by orangutans in the BIG STUPID. Chuckle.
>
> Crawl back into your sewer you cockroach!
>
> And yes! I am the FIRST human to state the MVT correctly and to prove the MVT constructively.
>
> Eat my shit.
>

Date Subject Author
11/8/17 Jan Burse
11/8/17 Jan Burse