Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
Sci.math morons still struggling to prove that m+n is ALWAYS a factor of New Calculus derivative!
Replies:
2
Last Post:
Nov 8, 2017 8:09 PM




Re: Sci.math morons still struggling to prove that m+n is ALWAYS a factor of New Calculus derivative!
Posted:
Nov 8, 2017 7:52 PM


As I said MVT can be reduced to find max of a function g(x), respectively g'(x)=0.
You just provided me a link:
Look at the proof, look at g(x): https://calculus.subwiki.org/wiki/Lagrange_mean_value_theorem#Proof
Max of a function is not constructive.
Nicht Konstruktiv Beweisbare Sätze der Analysis Specker, Ernst  J. Symbolic Logic Volume 14, Issue 3 (1949), 145158. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jsl/1183730665
Thank you very much, was looking for the missing piece.
John Gabriel schrieb: > On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 13:55:04 UTC5, burs...@gmail.com wrote: >> Bird brain John Gabriels nonsense knows no limits (pun intended). >> His newest nonsense: "Newton had NO idea about the mean value >> theorem whatsoever." >> >> The mean value theorem comes up in many facets, even in >> bird brain John Gabriels famous when John Gabriel >> was 13 years old: > > You'll have to update your Wikipedia Moronica! > > https://calculus.subwiki.org/wiki/Lagrange_mean_value_theorem > > La Grange (a French poodle) came long after Newton. > > This means he was younger you birdbrain! > > And guess what? Even he did not provide a proof and certainly did not state the theorem in the UNREMARKABLE way that it is stated by orangutans in the BIG STUPID. Chuckle. > > Crawl back into your sewer you cockroach! > > And yes! I am the FIRST human to state the MVT correctly and to prove the MVT constructively. > > Eat my shit. >



