Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
Why do we need those real nonconstructible numbers?
Replies:
1
Last Post:
Nov 11, 2017 2:10 PM




Re: Why do we need those real nonconstructible numbers?
Posted:
Nov 11, 2017 2:10 PM


Am Samstag, 11. November 2017 17:51:15 UTC+1 schrieb Dan Christensen: > On Saturday, November 11, 2017 at 4:32:09 AM UTC5, WM wrote: > > Am Freitag, 10. November 2017 19:50:36 UTC+1 schrieb Dan Christensen: > > > On Friday, November 10, 2017 at 9:53:06 AM UTC5, WM wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Therefore we use only FOL and the axioms of ZF and find that they make ZF uncountable without refering to anything else (that others may call a model but that you don't know and that threfore should not be used when talking to you). > > > > > > To prove that ZFC is inconsistent, you must be able to both prove and disprove the same theorem using only FOL and the axioms ZFC. > > > > No. My share is done, showing that the power set of the set defined in Axiom VII is uncountable. > > It is a well known result that the power set of any infinite set is uncountable.
In every model of ZF. > > > > The other part has been settled by Skolem already. > > > > Bullshit.
So said Zermelo too, not with your language of the gutter though. > Regards, WM



