Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: If you claim 0.999... is a rational number, then you must find
p/q such that 0.999... = p/q. 12/26/2017

Replies: 40   Last Post: Jan 4, 2018 7:37 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 bursejan@gmail.com Posts: 5,511 Registered: 9/25/16
Re: If you claim 0.999... is a rational number, then you must find
p/q such that 0.999... = p/q. 12/26/2017

Posted: Dec 28, 2017 6:17 PM

The downfall of WM, from prolific critic of set
theory to ordinary 0.999... <> 1 Crank.

Am Freitag, 29. Dezember 2017 00:15:49 UTC+1 schrieb burs...@gmail.com:
> Not the only idiotic statement, of course also the
> other Crank theme lim n->oo S_n <> S_n /* which is
> true for many sequences S_n */.
>
> So the observation that Amoeba Logic is a result
> of missing neurons, is mostlikely true. A lot
> of neurons are missing here...
>
> Am Freitag, 29. Dezember 2017 00:08:24 UTC+1 schrieb Python:

> > WM wrote:
> > > [snip usual Mueckenheim's crackpotry]
> >
> > This is, below, a new kind of idiotic claim on your part, Herr
> > Mueckenheim:
> >

> > > One of the wrong "results" is the idea that Cantor proved the existence of transcendental
> > > numbers and the idea that the measure of the reals is 1 and the measure of the rationals
> > > is 0 in the unit interval.

> >
> > So you deny the existence of transcendental numbers now, Herr
> > Mueckenheim?
> >
> > You too seem to have issue with measure theory (like your brother
> > crank Gabriel). Not a big surprise though...
> >
> > So, what is, according to you the measure of the set of rational numbers
> > belonging the the unit interval if not 0?