The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: finite maze solving algorithm
Replies: 9   Last Post: Dec 3, 2004 7:09 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Michael Michalchik

Posts: 89
Registered: 12/13/04
Re: finite maze solving algorithm
Posted: Nov 30, 2004 9:49 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Kevin Saff <> wrote in message news:<>...
> Michael Michalchik wrote:
> > I was wondering if anyone knows if all possible topologies of finite
> > 2d mazes can be solved by a finite algorithm. For example, we know
> > that all fully connected mazes can be solved by picking a wall and
> > exhaustively following it. Can a general solution work for all mazes
> > including the ones that are piecewise disconnected? If this is
> > possible, is the general solution a solved problem?
> Interesting. How are you defining a maze, here? Usually, I think of a
> maze as just a graph, which you can solve using something simple like
> depth-first search, regardless of whether it is planar. It is probably
> better to think in terms of connectedness of rooms than connectedness of
> walls.
> (I hope I am not being ignorant here, but you seem to be using
> "topology" and "piecewise disconnected" in strange ways. Obviously if
> the topological space is disconnected, there will be no path possible
> between points in different components - in the discrete topology, if
> you're not there, you can't get there.)

I am probably using those terms in an unusual way, being entirely a
layman. When I refer to piecewise disconnnected I mean the walls not
the paths. I understand that an unconnected path can not be traversed.
To look at this problem interms of paths (which I guess is the graph
theory approach you refer to) you would need to posit a set of graphs
that included loops, dead ends, routes that deadend in loops, and
various structures of loops nested and sharing common branches. I wish
usenet was friendlier to hand drawn diagrams embedded in text. That
would make explaining this a lot easier.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.