Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.stat.edu
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
Is there a way to visualize 4D data?
Replies:
1
Last Post:
Jun 28, 2006 3:23 PM




Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?
Posted:
Jun 28, 2006 3:23 PM


no; the sequence of digital blares that one has heard for years from caralarms, which funded the bogus gubenatorial recall in California, always does that for me. so, what is a "militarypavlovian style," if you prefer not to address any of my questions?
Sir David is quite a guy, as proved in _A NEW Kind of Science_.
> > did you say that you could find the Bornouli numbers, > > using the buckynumbers, that is not a triviality? >> > > thus:
> > I note that that last graph had 3 coordinates, > > with differentsized tetrahedra and "hue for 0 > > through 2;" so, What?
> > what possible use could your Buckynumbers have, > > that has not already been covered by other homogenous 3d formats?...
> > when you find a mathematicalphysical application, > > I'm sure that you'll announce it! > > > > >One fourdimensional point is a regular wireframe tetrahedron in the > > >Synergetics coordinate system and you can make each point a different > > >hue and you might see something you're looking for, who knows? > > > > > >See the last graphic in the Section The Vector Equilibrium at: > > >http://users.adelphia.net/~cnelson9/
> Does the name Pavlov ring a bell? Your militaryPavlovian style > propaganda against Wolfram's Mathematica will work unfortunately. I even
thus: monsieur Magadin was, I think, working with scalars, so that the "subspace" was artificially mooted. all of this was covered by Hamilton in _Quaternions_, where the terminology was coined.... one problem is that common parlance of "subspace," would be merely a region of a larger space, although it's not a problem, since the parlance is really only common to math and sciencefiction, as far as I know, and it's mostly going to deal with dimensionality, otherwise. if so, then you're not going to look at silly degenerate cases (say, a Hilbert space of infinite dimensions, all pointing on the same complex vector to your forehead ... although this is exactly what Hamilton did with his first "2D" complex numbers, on one line (I think, homogenous coordinates, oppositely directed .)
> If you do not hand wave or lie, the why should you feel insulted?
thus: good point. although there is a 2.5page proof of the isomorphism of deductive & inductive proofs, I don't know of one from induction to "bizzaarr circumlocution."
> "Thus together with step n = 3 the extension of the statement of the > overlapping to the step n = 4 > is that each even number in the step n = 4 can be written as the sum of > > two prime numbers and these two prime numbers are each from a pair > of twin prime numbers in the steps n = 1, 2, 3, 4 and that there > is a pair of twin prime numbers in the step n = 4 (and not in the step > n > = 1, 2, 3) such that the sum of this pair of twin prime numbers is an > even number in the step n = 5. " > > How Sze knows that in the steps n>5 there are twin primes? > Between 1322 and 1432 there are not twin primes.
it takes some to jitterbug! http://members.tripod.com/~american_almanac http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/2006_articles/Amplitude.W05.pdf http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/plates/figs/plate01.html http://larouchepub.com/other/2006/3322_ethanol_no_science.html http://www.wlym.com/pdf/iclc/howthenation.pdf



