In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 27 Nov., 02:50, William Hughes <wpihug...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > On Nov 26, 4:51 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > > > On 26 Nov., 19:22, William Hughes <wpihug...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > Only in Wolkenmuekenheim. Outside of Wolkenmuekenheim > > > > you will have an empty set. > > > > > Besides your assertion, you have arguments too, don't you? > > > In particular you can explain, how the empty set will emerge while > > > throughout the whole time the minimum contents of the vase is 1 ball? > > > > Since outside of Wolkenmuekenheim there is no reason to > > expect the number of balls to be continuous at infinity > > Why then do you expect the digits of Cantor's diagonal number to be > "continuous" at infinity (contrary to being *not* at infinity)?
Why would anyone ever expect a numerical digit to be continuous?
All the ones I am aware of are members of a finite set of discrete objects.
And why would you expect to find a digit of any sort "at infinity", when there is no such a position as "at infinity".