Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.



Re: RE: Wired Campus Article: "Professor Textblaster"
Posted:
Mar 2, 2010 6:27 PM



Robert Hansen wrote:
http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=6998612
> Dave, you wouldn't happen to have any of those quizzes > or exams that you could post do you?
I've attached a few to this Math Forum post. However, because I haven't had other people (who have the appropriate software) convert my less interesting (read: lower level intermediate algebra, trig, etc.) items to .pdf form, what I'm posting is not really representative of my quizzes and tests as a whole (no trig. stuff, no college algebra stuff, no intermediate algebra stuff, almost no precalculus stuff, ...).
Some of the .pdf file versions have strange page breaks and possibly other formatting issues that were not present in the original versions. For instance, one of the ways I manage to squeeze an extra 3 or 4 lines of type onto a page, such as when I want to complete the statement of a comment or fit a graph on the page I want it on (besides using negative vertical space LaTeX code in certain locations) is to set the page style default to A4 paper, and then insert page breaks before the stuff goes too low on the page (which previewing shows), and I haven't been worrying about this when I've sent some of my files to others to convert them to .pdf format.
Here's an overview of the items I'm posting.
"bus cal exam"  Final Exam for a business calculus class. (A 1semester course that introduces basic calculus ideas; no trig. but does use exponential and logarithmic functions.) After printing out a copy of the test, but before I photocopied and stapled copies for students, I handlabeled some points in the graph for #8. Also, for some reason, the blank graph I had set up for #9 didn't come out. Finally, the extra credit problems were an optional topic I intended to cover but didn't get to, so I gave a reading assignment and some homework problems for students to work on and said the material would be extra credit on the exam.
"bus cal test 4" and "bus cal quiz 15"  Note the resemblance of the quiz problems to a certain problem on the exam and a certain problem on test 4.
"diff eq quiz 3" and "diff eq quiz 4"  These are solutions, but the original quiz was the same as what you see except the problems were not written in italicized form and in place of the solutions was blank space for the students to write in (and the title/header didn't have "solutions" in it).
"lin alg quiz 3", "lin alg quiz 4", and "lin alg quiz 6"  Note the extra credit hint in a footnote in quiz 6. Several students said they wouldn't have gotten the extra credit problem if I had not included the footnote, but with the hint they learned an almost unforgettable way of getting those pesky addition angle trig. identities. (One of the students who got the EC but didn't know the identities was a then first semester Freshman who is now working on his Ph.D. in math at Iowa State Univ.) Incidentally, we hadn't yet talked about rotations in the plane yet when I gave quiz 6. The extra credit served as "an opener" for rotations, which I went over after the quiz (which was given at the beginning of the class, not the end). Note the rotation problem on test 2, which was given about a week later.
"lin alg test 2" and "lin alg test 4"  test 4 was a takehome test.
"LSMSA precal test 4"  This was for a very strong (even by LSMSA standards) precalculus class I taught in Fall 1998. Probably half the class zoomed through the nonextra credit material missing little (besides occasionally overlooking some detail or other), hence the stiff extra credit. I still had maybe 3 students (out of 12 or 13 total) get EC A (one got it completely correct and I believe a couple of others overlooked something but "mostly got it") and 2 or 3 students get the first two parts of EC B.
"LSMSA multi test 4a" and "LSMSA multi test 4b"  These are a take home test for a third semester calculus course (of which the first third dealt with sequences, series, and Taylor series applications) that typically only the very strongest (and most interested) students at the school took. Version 'b' is a couple of years after Version 'a'. Neither version would be appropriate for a college course, except maybe for a very strong honors class.
Dave L. Renfro



