The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Courses » ap-stat

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: CI for p
Replies: 1   Last Post: Apr 11, 1997 2:58 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View  
Richard Scheaffer

Posts: 440
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: CI for p
Posted: Apr 11, 1997 2:58 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On CI's, the CI for p with p-hat in the variance is
too liberal in that it produces intervals for which
the coverage probability tends to be much smaller
than the nominal. For example, it is not unusual for
intervals of nominal 95% coverage to have actual
coverage probabilities more than 10% lower than that
even for samples as large as 30. Using the t
multiplier instead of the z makes the intervals a
little longer and, hence, increases the coverage
probability. Thus, the t turns out to be a decent
practical solution for no good theoretical

There are many other "solutions" to this problem,
some of the better ones coming out of the Bayesian
approach. But, it is difficult to bring all of this
into an introductory course. For AP, we will have to
accept the standard textbook approach.

A good resource is the book by Santner and Duffy

Dick Scheaffer

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.