On Oct 17, 1:16 pm, huge <h...@operamail.com> wrote: > On 10/16/2010 09:00 PM, Patrido Aldorayme wrote: > > > Listing all these logics is simply swamping a discussion rather > > mindlessly. You are required to do more than present lists. I know > > your thing is not explanation, your preference is always rudeness, > > abuse, teensy weensy nothing sentences, petulant demands and now, to > > bulk up, we have you listing things! > > Goodness! Long rants and other messaging dysentery are not something > you should be proud of. >
What made you think I was *proud of* *Long rants and other messaging dysentery*?
You have a bad thinking problem. But then you show that rather a lot. If you have a philosophical point to make, like that no one has claimed there is a type of argument that can be said to exist, rightly and usefully called inductive, do say. But if you have not got anything philosophical to say, except to blurt out sarcasm, misunderstand nearly everything, be incredibly rude, what is there in it for you?