Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.



Smash Product
Posted:
Apr 22, 2011 1:30 PM


Let X and Y be topological spaces.
The wedge of X and Y at a in X, b in Y is .. . (X v Y)_(a,b) = Xx{b} \/ {a}xY
The smash product of X and Y at a in X, b in Y is .. . (X ^ Y)_(a,b) = (X x Y)/(X v Y)_(a,b).
where for A subset Z, Z/A is the quotient space of Z identifying all the points of A to a single point.
For example. (R v R)_(0,0) is the union of the xaxis and the yaxis.
What's an intuitive description or understanding of (R ^ R)_(0,0) or of ([0,oo) ^ [0,oo))_(0,0) ?
I use = to mean equal within a homeomorphism.
It's easy to show that the wedge is associative that ((X v Y)_(a,b) v Z)_((a,b),c) = (X v (Y v Z)_(b,c))_(a,(b,c)) = Xx{b}x{c} \/ {a}xYx{c} \/ {a}x{b}xZ
which notates as (X v Y v Z)_(a,b,c).
Is the smash product associative? Does ((X ^ Y)_(a,b) ^ Z)_((a,b),c) = (X ^ (Y ^ Z)_(b,c))_(a,(b,c))?
In addition do both of those smash products .. . = (X x Y x Z)/(X v Y v Z)^(a,b,c) ?
In attempts to proof this, I've discovered and proved a simple theorem X/A / B/A = X/B.
I think for a in A subset X, b in Y, something like (X/A x Y)/(X v Y)_(a,b) = (X x Y)/(A v Y)_(a,b)
would suffice. However something doesn't seem quite right about the formulation of the lemma nor does the simple theorem seem of use.
Perhaps I need something like if B is a partition of X and A s refinement of then X/A / B/A = X/B where now Z/A is the quotient space of Z gotten by mapping Z into the partition A.
Then I think the following holds. X/A x Y = (X x Y)/R
where R is the partition of X x Y into the equivalence classes of the equivalence relation (x,y) ~ (a,b) when y = b & (x = a or x,a in A).
Help, I'm smashed tanking too much of that product.



