The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.symbolic

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: How to I get Maple to spit out 1?
Replies: 6   Last Post: Jul 14, 2011 4:30 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Axel Vogt

Posts: 1,068
Registered: 5/5/07
Re: How to I get Maple to spit out 1?
Posted: Jul 14, 2011 3:24 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 14.07.2011 01:27, Salmon Egg wrote:
> I already know the answer.
> If I get to an expression
> z := x*exp(-(1/2)*x)/(2*sinh((1/2)*x))*((exp(x)-1)/x)
> How do I get Maple to spit out 1? simplify does not do it.
> I looked at the help for simplify, and looked up convert and then See
> Also. That looked promising, so I went to help on Convert. Convert had a
> bus load of optional arguments. exp looked promising and worked, much to
> my pleasant surprise.
> If I were even less knowledgeable than I am, how could I go about
> finding a correct approach? Is it merely an empirical search? Is there a
> guidebook? Suppose I had a much more complicated expression, say with
> radicals and Bessel functions. Us there a cookbook approach to
> simplification?

For guessing I often just plot as a first step ...

Difficult to say, though I would expect that Maple would try
to convert hyperbolics to exp, as we would do, since other
exp terms are present.

The simplification problem is not specific for Maple, but it
is a problem in any symbolic software system (thus I included

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.