In article <3f31e1b4-b4d1-42e7-bdb2-9ae5dbd2fc90@br5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 13 Aug., 21:46, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > In article > > <45052661-75f4-4897-bffe-e7a76a4f1...@z17g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > On 12 Aug., 23:04, SPQR <S...@roman.gov> wrote: > > > > In article > > > > > > > > > Supertask 1: > > > > > > > > > Fill in 1 to 10, remove 1, > > > > > > > fill in 11 to 20, remove 2, > > > > > > > fill in 21 to 30, remove 3, > > > > > > > and so on. > > > > > > > After all all numbers are removed. > > > > > > > > > Supertask 2: > > > > > > > > > Fill in 1 to 10, remove 10, > > > > > > > fill in 11 to 20, remove 20, > > > > > > > fill in 21 to 30, remove 30, > > > > > > > and so on. > > > > > > > After all not all numbers are removed. > > > > > > > But the quantities are identical in both cases. > > > > > > But the behavior of individual elements are not. > > > > > > And any "Limit" value", if defined at all, must take into account what > > > > happens to each individual > > > > > The individuals are cardinal numbers: > > > > > 0, 9, 18, 27, ... > > > > > in both cases we have the same individuals. > > > > To my mind, the "individuals" are the objects being filled in or removed > > and not merely counts of such objects. > > That is one possible position. The other possible position is that the > cardinalities are the individual. And if both positions diverge, then > the theory is wrong.
Your "other position" deliberately ignores some of the requirements of either supertask so is a false position. > > > > If only those counts counted there would be no difference between the > > supertasks at all. > > Correct. > > > > So that in claiming that there is a difference one is conceding that WM > > is wrong. > > No. The theory depends on how the objects are named and what some > individuals consider as objects at all. That shows that the theory is > invalid.
Only in WM's matheology. When one does not ignore specific requirements of those supertasks, as WM insists on doing, they have different results. --
