Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Replies: 67   Last Post: Oct 22, 2011 9:19 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
eric gisse

Posts: 47
Registered: 6/6/11
Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Posted: Oct 8, 2011 5:31 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

PD <thedraperfamily@gmail.com> wrote in
news:db4afd78-3cb0-405b-91ef-8ed192f19bbe@m5g2000vbe.googlegroups.com:

> On Oct 8, 12:29 am, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Oct 7, 2:25 pm, PD <thedraperfam...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>

>> > On 10/7/2011 3:53 PM, Koobee Wublee wrote:
>> > > The whole business of accelerating expansion of your universe is
>> > > believe in the Chandrasekhar limit which itself is made up of
>> > > several dubious assumptions.

>>
>> > You're nuts, KW. There's nothing in Hubble's OBSERVATIONAL
>> > MEASUREMENTS that depends on the Chandrasekhar limit at all. It's
>> > just a plot of redshift (measured with diffraction gratings)
>> > against distance (measure

> d
>> > with standard candles).
>>
>> The most two important hypotheses that claim an accelerated expansion
>> of your universe are:
>>
>> ****  Hubble expansion law
>>
>> **  z = k r
>>
>> Where
>>
>> **  z = red shift
>> **  k = constant
>> **  r = distance

>
> Note that this is an empirical law. That is, it is an *observational*
> relationship between measured quantities.


It hasn't even been empirically true for 70 years, as the relationship
between distance and redshift is highly nonlinear once one gets into the
far reachers of time and space.

Not that the wublee has any clue about this, or willingness to learn.

[...]


Date Subject Author
10/7/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Koobee Wublee
10/7/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Sam Wormley
10/8/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Koobee Wublee
10/8/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Sam Wormley
10/9/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Koobee Wublee
10/9/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Sam Wormley
10/9/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
jon car
10/22/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Luis A. Rodriguez
10/8/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
bradguth@gmail.com
10/8/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Sam Wormley
10/8/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
hanson
10/8/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
bradguth@gmail.com
10/9/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Sam Wormley
10/9/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
bradguth@gmail.com
10/9/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Sam Wormley
10/10/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Tom Potter
10/10/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Sam Wormley
10/10/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
hanson
10/10/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Androcles
10/10/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
hanson
10/10/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Henry Wilson DSc
10/10/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Androcles
10/10/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
hanson
10/10/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Henry Wilson DSc
10/10/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Androcles
10/10/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
hanson
10/10/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Tom Potter
10/11/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Sam Wormley
10/12/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Tom Potter
10/12/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
hanson
10/12/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Henry Wilson DSc
10/12/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
hanson
10/13/11
Read do
Henry Wilson DSc
10/13/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Tom Potter
10/13/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
hanson
10/13/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Henry Wilson DSc
10/13/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
hanson
10/13/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
bradguth@gmail.com
10/13/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
hanson
10/14/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
bradguth@gmail.com
10/14/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Tom Potter
10/14/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
hanson
10/11/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
me again
10/11/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
bradguth@gmail.com
10/8/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Koobee Wublee
10/8/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Jerry
10/8/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Koobee Wublee
10/8/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Jerry
10/8/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Peter Webb
10/8/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
eric gisse
10/8/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
PD
10/8/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
PD
10/8/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
eric gisse
10/9/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Koobee Wublee
10/9/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
PD
10/9/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Koobee Wublee
10/10/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Peter Webb
10/14/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Koobee Wublee
10/14/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Peter Webb
10/10/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
PD
10/22/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Mistress Helios
10/12/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Steve Pope
10/12/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
Henry Wilson DSc
10/12/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
eric gisse
10/12/11
Read Re: TERRIBLE Nobel Prize for Accelerating Universe
bradguth@gmail.com

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.