In article <9b50b988-6648-4396-850f-c3e44d246a04@f13g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 25 Okt., 21:46, SPQR <S...@roman.gov> wrote: > > In article > > <4d1244bd-7ae7-4e40-b3b3-b5c0b640b...@c1g2000vbw.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > On 25 Okt., 13:46, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > WM does not know what maximum means. He thinks that if the > > > > statements > > > > > > x is a maximum y is a supremem > > > > > > are true, then x=/= y. > > > > > No. Of course a supremum can be a maximum, but it need not. > > > Consult my book
No one familiar with what you post here would ever be likely to make that mistake.
