The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Inactive » calc_reform

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: AP
Replies: 4   Last Post: Sep 21, 2004 11:26 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Jerry Uhl

Posts: 1,267
Registered: 12/3/04
Re: AP
Posted: Jan 31, 1996 11:42 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

At 9:03 PM 1/31/96 -0500, Mark Howell (Gonzaga wrote:

>I'd be interested in hearing what Jerry (or anyone
>else, for that matter!) thinks the new ideas are
>that we need to try to get at. Are there things we're *not*
>now trying to teach in Calculus that we should be trying to teach?
>What? And why?

Instead of writing a huge amount, I'll refer you to the
Calculus&Mathematica web page. You can download the courseware and see what
we think a modern calculus course is.

Jerry Uhl
Professor of Mathematics 1409 West Green Street
University of Illinois Urbana,Illinois 61801
Calculus&Mathematica Development Team

"Calculus, as currently taught, is full of inert material..."
----------------Peter Lax

Date Subject Author
Read AP
John A Benson
Read Re: AP
Jerry Uhl
Read Re: AP
Mark Howell (Gonzaga)
Read Re: AP
Jerry Uhl
Read Re: AP

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.