Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.

Topic: Deniers Mangle Basic Logic Even Worse Than Isolated or Scientific Facts
Replies: 50   Last Post: Jan 21, 2012 9:45 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 alanmc95210@yahoo.com Posts: 6 Registered: 7/11/05
Re: Deniers Mangle Basic Logic Even Worse Than Isolated or Scientific Facts
Posted: Jan 21, 2012 12:49 PM

On Jan 13, 11:21 am, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
> > > The guy who signs his monicker, thusly, what can you tell us about the

>
> > > Can you tell us the Source and can you identify the Land Areas, or
> > > better yet, the Countries that are Cooling?

>
> > A few of the world's countries are in fact cooling due to
> > human-caused global warming. The vast majority of the world's
> > countries are warming, and at an unprecedented rate, from an
> > unprecedented cause (human activity).

>
> The most interesting thing about deniers isn't that they rely on bogus
> facts but that the facts they use contradict their conclusions.
>
> For example, if one third of the earth is cooling then the
> implications are,
>
> 1.   2/3rds of the surface is warming, possibly at a higher rate than
> the cooling of the other third.  The fact that deniers haven't (up
> until now) ever suggested that the cooling of the one third is much
> greater than the warming of the 2/3rds just shows they are too
> ignorant of middle school math to even argue in their own direction.
>
> 2.  the studies of tree rings in one region don't say anything about
> the _global_ climate.
>
> Bret Cahill

http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/7/1/014007/pdf/1748-9326_7_1_014007.pdf

"Abstract
The most up to date consensus from global climate models predicts
warming in the Northern
Hemisphere (NH) high latitudes to middle latitudes during boreal
winter. However, recent
trends in observed NH winter surface temperatures diverge from these
projections. For the last
large stretches of eastern
North America and northern Eurasia."

CAGW theory doesn't match observations. Therefore, CAGW theory is
WRONG!!
- A. McIntire

Date Subject Author
1/13/12 BretCahill@peoplepc.com
1/13/12 Transition Zone
1/13/12 mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
1/14/12 Frederick Williams
1/15/12 Transfer Principle
1/18/12 mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
1/20/12 Errol
1/20/12 mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
1/18/12 AGW Facts
1/18/12 mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
1/14/12 BretCahill@peoplepc.com
1/18/12 mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
1/18/12 Dawlish
1/21/12 mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
1/21/12 Bret Cahill
1/13/12 mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
1/13/12 bacle
1/21/12 Ala
1/13/12 mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
1/13/12 bacle
1/18/12 tunderbar
1/18/12 Bret Cahill
1/18/12 Peter Webb
1/18/12 Bret Cahill
1/19/12 Peter Webb
1/19/12 Bret Cahill
1/19/12 mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
1/19/12 Bret Cahill
1/19/12 mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
1/20/12 Bret Cahill
1/20/12 mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
1/21/12 Bret Cahill
1/21/12 mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
1/21/12 Bret Cahill
1/21/12 Peter Webb
1/21/12 Bret Cahill
1/21/12 Peter Webb
1/21/12 Bret Cahill
1/21/12 mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
1/21/12 Bret Cahill
1/21/12 Ala
1/19/12 tunderbar
1/20/12 AGW Facts
1/20/12 mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
1/21/12 alanmc95210@yahoo.com
1/21/12 R Kym Horsell
1/21/12 alanmc95210@yahoo.com
1/21/12 Bret Cahill
1/21/12 bw
1/21/12 R Kym Horsell
1/21/12 Ala