Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Replies: 70   Last Post: Feb 25, 2012 3:01 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Chris Menzel

Posts: 622
Registered: 12/13/04
Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Posted: Feb 22, 2012 7:16 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 07:48:03 -0500, Shmuel Metz
<spamtrap@library.lspace.org.invalid> said:
> In <slrnjk71dv.put.cmenzel@philebus.tamu.edu>, on 02/21/2012
> at 11:53 AM, Chris Menzel <cmenzel@remove-this.tamu.edu> said:
>

>>Judgments differ regarding naturalness but one issue is that K's
>>definition of <a,b> does not involve objects other than a and b (and
>>sets immediately constructed from them) in the definition. I myself
>>find that a bit more "natural" than pulling two arbitrarily chosen
>>objects into the definition that (in general) have no connection
>>whatever to a and b.

>
> While I find (a,b)={{a},{a,b}} to be more natural for ordered pairs,
> it does not generalize well to m-tuples.


But only in regard to "naturalness", right? I mean, in general, for
n>1, we have <a1,...,an,an+1> = <<a1,...,an>,an+1> = {{<a1,...,an>},
{<a1,...,an>},{an+1}}, which is perfectly well defined under K's
definition.



Date Subject Author
2/20/12
Read Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/20/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Kaba
2/20/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Herman Rubin
2/20/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/20/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
David Yen
2/21/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Chris Menzel
2/21/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
2/21/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/21/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/21/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
namducnguyen
2/21/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
2/21/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
namducnguyen
2/21/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
namducnguyen
2/22/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
2/22/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
namducnguyen
2/22/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
2/22/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/22/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Herman Rubin
2/22/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/22/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Graham Cooper
2/22/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Graham Cooper
2/22/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Graham Cooper
2/22/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Chris Menzel
2/22/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Graham Cooper
2/23/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Graham Cooper
2/23/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Herman Rubin
2/23/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Graham Cooper
2/23/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/23/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/23/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/23/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Graham Cooper
2/23/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/23/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/23/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/23/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Herman Rubin
2/23/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Graham Cooper
2/23/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/23/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Graham Cooper
2/23/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/23/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Graham Cooper
2/23/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Graham Cooper
2/24/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/24/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Graham Cooper
2/24/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/24/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/24/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Graham Cooper
2/24/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/24/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/24/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/24/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Graham Cooper
2/24/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/24/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Graham Cooper
2/24/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/24/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Graham Cooper
2/24/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Graham Cooper
2/24/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/24/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Graham Cooper
2/25/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/25/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Graham Cooper
2/23/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/23/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Graham Cooper
2/23/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/23/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/23/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Graham Cooper
2/23/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/23/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Graham Cooper
2/23/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/23/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
2/21/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/22/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Zaljohar@gmail.com
2/22/12
Read Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Graham Cooper

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.